<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Shulman LN</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2311-7</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4105484</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>32(22)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer balances efficacy and toxicity. We sought to determine whether single-agent paclitaxel (T) was inferior to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), when each was administered for four or six cycles of therapy, and whether it offered less toxicity.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Patients with operable breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive nodes were enrolled onto the study to address the noninferiority of single-agent T to AC, defined as the one-sided 95% upper-bound CI (UCB) of hazard ratio (HR) of T versus AC less than 1.30 for the primary end point of relapse-free survival (RFS). As a 2 × 2 factorial design, duration of therapy was also addressed and was previously reported.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>With 3,871 patients enrolled on</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus single-agent paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4105484</pmcid><funding_grant_id>N01 CA032102</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA045418</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA047559</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA032102</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA077651</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA025224</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA077658</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA047577</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA77658</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA77651</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA21115</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180838</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA032291</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA021115</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA33601</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA31946</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA031946</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180882</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UG1 CA233180</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180820</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA015083</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA25224</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA47577</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180867</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA3360</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA033601</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180821</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA47559</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U10 CA180888</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA45418</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA32291</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Norton L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shulman LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schneider CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Regan R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perez EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shapiro CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berry DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Becker HP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Winer EP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cirrincione CT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hudis CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burstein HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muss H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martino S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kimmick G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus single-agent paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance).</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer balances efficacy and toxicity. We sought to determine whether single-agent paclitaxel (T) was inferior to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), when each was administered for four or six cycles of therapy, and whether it offered less toxicity.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Patients with operable breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive nodes were enrolled onto the study to address the noninferiority of single-agent T to AC, defined as the one-sided 95% upper-bound CI (UCB) of hazard ratio (HR) of T versus AC less than 1.30 for the primary end point of relapse-free survival (RFS). As a 2 × 2 factorial design, duration of therapy was also addressed and was previously reported.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>With 3,871 patients enrolled on</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014 Aug</publication><modification>2026-04-29T08:59:00.638Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:32:29Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4105484</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24934787</pubmed><doi>10.1200/JCO.2013.53.7142</doi><doi>10.1200/jco.2013.53.7142</doi></cross_references></HashMap>