<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Li J</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCRR NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>430-8</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4112407</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>38(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that draw samples from multiple studies with a mixture of relationship structures are becoming more common. Analytical methods exist for using mixed-sample data, but few methods have been proposed for the analysis of genotype-by-environment (G×E) interactions. Using GWAS data from a study of sarcoidosis susceptibility genes in related and unrelated African Americans, we explored the current analytic options for genotype association testing in studies using both unrelated and family-based designs. We propose a novel method-generalized least squares (GLX)-to estimate both SNP and G×E interaction effects for categorical environmental covariates and compared this method to generalized estimating equations (GEE), logistic regression, the Cochran-Armitage trend test, and the WQLS and MQLS methods. We used simulation to demonstrate that the GLX method reduces type I error under a variety of pedigree structures. We also demonstrate its superior power to detect SNP effects while offering computational advantages and comparable power to detect G×E interactions versus GEE. Using this method, we found two novel SNPs that demonstrate a significant genome-wide interaction with insecticide exposure-rs10499003 and rs7745248, located in the intronic and 3' UTR regions of the FUT9 gene on chromosome 6q16.1.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Genetic epidemiology</journal><pubmed_title>Efficient generalized least squares method for mixed population and family-based samples in genome-wide association studies.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4112407</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HL071205</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 RR033176</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R56-AI072727</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL071051</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL113326</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL071250</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1-RR-025005</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL071251</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL071205</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01-HL54306</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 RR025005</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P20 GM103456</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01-HL092576</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R56 AI072727</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R56-AI072727, R01-HL092576 (BAR); R01-HL54306, U01-HL060263 (MCI); 1RC2HL101499, R01HL113326 (CGM);</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1TR000124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P20GM103456</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL071259</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL071258</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR000124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1RC2HL101499</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL071051</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL092576</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RC2 HL101499</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL071251</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL071250</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL113326</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 HL060263</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL071258</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL071259</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01-HL060263</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1RR033176</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Montgomery CG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adrianto I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McKeigue P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rybicki BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iannuzzi MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trudeau S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Datta I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levin AM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficient generalized least squares method for mixed population and family-based samples in genome-wide association studies.</name><description>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that draw samples from multiple studies with a mixture of relationship structures are becoming more common. Analytical methods exist for using mixed-sample data, but few methods have been proposed for the analysis of genotype-by-environment (G×E) interactions. Using GWAS data from a study of sarcoidosis susceptibility genes in related and unrelated African Americans, we explored the current analytic options for genotype association testing in studies using both unrelated and family-based designs. We propose a novel method-generalized least squares (GLX)-to estimate both SNP and G×E interaction effects for categorical environmental covariates and compared this method to generalized estimating equations (GEE), logistic regression, the Cochran-Armitage trend test, and the WQLS and MQLS methods. We used simulation to demonstrate that the GLX method reduces type I error under a variety of pedigree structures. We also demonstrate its superior power to detect SNP effects while offering computational advantages and comparable power to detect G×E interactions versus GEE. Using this method, we found two novel SNPs that demonstrate a significant genome-wide interaction with insecticide exposure-rs10499003 and rs7745248, located in the intronic and 3' UTR regions of the FUT9 gene on chromosome 6q16.1.</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014 Jul</publication><modification>2024-11-11T18:38:33.301Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:32:53Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4112407</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24845555</pubmed><doi>10.1002/gepi.21811</doi></cross_references></HashMap>