<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Shrestha S</submitter><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>ofu073</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4281792</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>1(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>New first-line drug regimens for treatment of tuberculosis (TB) are in clinical trials: emergence of resistance is a key concern. Because population-level data on resistance cannot be collected in advance, epidemiological models are important tools for understanding the drivers and dynamics of resistance before novel drug regimens are launched.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We developed a transmission model of TB after launch of a new drug regimen, defining drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) as resistance to the new regimen. The model is characterized by (1) the probability of acquiring resistance during treatment, (2) the transmission fitness of DR-TB relative to drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB), and (3) the probability of treatment success for DR-TB versus DS-TB. We evaluate the effect of each factor on future DR-TB prevalence, defined as the proportion of incident TB that is drug-resistant.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Probability of acquired resistance was the strongest predictor of the DR-TB proportion in the first 5 years after the launch of a new drug regimen. Over a longer term, however, the DR-TB proportion was driven by the resistant population's transmission fitness and treatment success rates. Regardless of uncertainty in acquisition probability and transmission fitness, high levels (>10%) of drug resistance were unlikely to emerge within 50 years if, among all cases of TB that were detected, 85% of those with DR-TB could be appropriately diagnosed as such and then successfully treated.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Short-term surveillance cannot predict long-term drug resistance trends after launch of novel first-line TB regimens. Ensuring high treatment success of drug-resistant TB through early diagnosis and appropriate second-line therapy can mitigate many epidemiological uncertainties and may substantially slow the emergence of drug-resistant TB.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Open forum infectious diseases</journal><pubmed_title>Drivers and trajectories of resistance to new first-line drug regimens for tuberculosis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4281792</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32 GM007309</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/J005088/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>White RG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Knight GM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cobelens F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fofana M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shrestha S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dowdy DW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Drivers and trajectories of resistance to new first-line drug regimens for tuberculosis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>New first-line drug regimens for treatment of tuberculosis (TB) are in clinical trials: emergence of resistance is a key concern. Because population-level data on resistance cannot be collected in advance, epidemiological models are important tools for understanding the drivers and dynamics of resistance before novel drug regimens are launched.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We developed a transmission model of TB after launch of a new drug regimen, defining drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) as resistance to the new regimen. The model is characterized by (1) the probability of acquiring resistance during treatment, (2) the transmission fitness of DR-TB relative to drug-susceptible TB (DS-TB), and (3) the probability of treatment success for DR-TB versus DS-TB. We evaluate the effect of each factor on future DR-TB prevalence, defined as the proportion of incident TB that is drug-resistant.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Probability of acquired resistance was the strongest predictor of the DR-TB proportion in the first 5 years after the launch of a new drug regimen. Over a longer term, however, the DR-TB proportion was driven by the resistant population's transmission fitness and treatment success rates. Regardless of uncertainty in acquisition probability and transmission fitness, high levels (>10%) of drug resistance were unlikely to emerge within 50 years if, among all cases of TB that were detected, 85% of those with DR-TB could be appropriately diagnosed as such and then successfully treated.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Short-term surveillance cannot predict long-term drug resistance trends after launch of novel first-line TB regimens. Ensuring high treatment success of drug-resistant TB through early diagnosis and appropriate second-line therapy can mitigate many epidemiological uncertainties and may substantially slow the emergence of drug-resistant TB.</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014 Sep</publication><modification>2021-03-18T09:01:13Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:42:35Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4281792</accession><cross_references><pubmed>25734143</pubmed><doi>10.1093/ofid/ofu073</doi></cross_references></HashMap>