<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(2)</volume><submitter>Smeeing DP</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To determine the effectiveness and safety of interventions used for rehabilitation after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using both randomized trials and cohort studies. The effect of mobilization, weight-bearing, and unprotected weight-bearing as tolerated on postoperative recovery was compared using the Olerud Molander score, return to work/daily activities, and the rate of complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 25 articles were included. Ankle exercises resulted in earlier return to work and/or daily activities compared to immobilization (mean difference (MD) -20.76 days; 95% confidence interval (CI) -40.02 to -1.50). There was no difference in the rate of complications between exercises and immobilization (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% CI 0.60 to 2.45) or between early and late weight-bearing (RR 1.26; 95%CI 0.56 to 2.85).&lt;h4>Interpretation&lt;/h4>Results of this meta-analysis show that following ankle surgery, 1) active exercises accelerate return to work and daily activities compared to immobilization, 2) early weight-bearing tends to accelerate return to work and daily activities compared to late weight-bearing. Active exercises in combination with immediate weight-bearing may be a safe option.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e0118320</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4335061</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Weight-bearing and mobilization in the postoperative care of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4335061</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Segers MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verleisdonk EJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Houwert RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kelder JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leenen LP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Briet JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hietbrink F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smeeing DP</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Weight-bearing and mobilization in the postoperative care of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To determine the effectiveness and safety of interventions used for rehabilitation after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using both randomized trials and cohort studies. The effect of mobilization, weight-bearing, and unprotected weight-bearing as tolerated on postoperative recovery was compared using the Olerud Molander score, return to work/daily activities, and the rate of complications.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 25 articles were included. Ankle exercises resulted in earlier return to work and/or daily activities compared to immobilization (mean difference (MD) -20.76 days; 95% confidence interval (CI) -40.02 to -1.50). There was no difference in the rate of complications between exercises and immobilization (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% CI 0.60 to 2.45) or between early and late weight-bearing (RR 1.26; 95%CI 0.56 to 2.85).&lt;h4>Interpretation&lt;/h4>Results of this meta-analysis show that following ankle surgery, 1) active exercises accelerate return to work and daily activities compared to immobilization, 2) early weight-bearing tends to accelerate return to work and daily activities compared to late weight-bearing. Active exercises in combination with immediate weight-bearing may be a safe option.</description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015</publication><modification>2024-11-20T17:57:15.105Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:30:20Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4335061</accession><cross_references><pubmed>25695796</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0118320</doi></cross_references></HashMap>