<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15</volume><submitter>Rudiger M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Since an objective description is essential to determine infant's postnatal condition and efficacy of interventions, two scores were suggested in the past but weren't tested yet: The Specified-Apgar uses the 5 items of the conventional Apgar score; however describes the condition regardless of gestational age (GA) or resuscitative interventions. The Expanded-Apgar measures interventions needed to achieve this condition. We hypothesized that the combination of both (Combined-Apgar) describes postnatal condition of preterm infants better than either of the scores alone.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Scores were assessed in preterm infants below 32 completed weeks of gestation. Data were prospectively collected in 20 NICU in 12 countries. Prediction of poor outcome (death, severe/moderate</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC pediatrics</journal><pagination>18</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4374498</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Neonatal assessment in the delivery room--Trial to Evaluate a Specified Type of Apgar (TEST-Apgar).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4374498</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kuster H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yigit S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petruskeviciene Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Staal N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bergert R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braun N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matasova K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ifflaender S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aranda J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El-Atawi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vento M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ojinaga V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rudiger M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aguar M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>TEST-Apgar Study-Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bystricka A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dimitriou G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wendt A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simma B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vasconcellos MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zotter H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwindt J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weber B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veinla M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roll C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jung P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valencia G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Neonatal assessment in the delivery room--Trial to Evaluate a Specified Type of Apgar (TEST-Apgar).</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Since an objective description is essential to determine infant's postnatal condition and efficacy of interventions, two scores were suggested in the past but weren't tested yet: The Specified-Apgar uses the 5 items of the conventional Apgar score; however describes the condition regardless of gestational age (GA) or resuscitative interventions. The Expanded-Apgar measures interventions needed to achieve this condition. We hypothesized that the combination of both (Combined-Apgar) describes postnatal condition of preterm infants better than either of the scores alone.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Scores were assessed in preterm infants below 32 completed weeks of gestation. Data were prospectively collected in 20 NICU in 12 countries. Prediction of poor outcome (death, severe/moderate</description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015 Mar</publication><modification>2026-06-08T06:37:33.628Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:48:48Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4374498</accession><cross_references><pubmed>25884954</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12887-015-0334-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>