<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Burgess S</submitter><funding>British Heart Foundation</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><pagination>658-65</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4377079</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(7)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Genome-wide association studies, which typically report regression coefficients summarizing the associations of many genetic variants with various traits, are potentially a powerful source of data for Mendelian randomization investigations. We demonstrate how such coefficients from multiple variants can be combined in a Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome. The bias and efficiency of estimates based on summarized data are compared to those based on individual-level data in simulation studies. We investigate the impact of gene-gene interactions, linkage disequilibrium, and 'weak instruments' on these estimates. Both an inverse-variance weighted average of variant-specific associations and a likelihood-based approach for summarized dat</pubmed_abstract><journal>Genetic epidemiology</journal><pubmed_title>Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4377079</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MR/L003120/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NF-SI-0512-10165</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>SP/08/007/23628</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RG/08/014/24067</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Thompson SG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burgess S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Butterworth A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.</name><description>Genome-wide association studies, which typically report regression coefficients summarizing the associations of many genetic variants with various traits, are potentially a powerful source of data for Mendelian randomization investigations. We demonstrate how such coefficients from multiple variants can be combined in a Mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome. The bias and efficiency of estimates based on summarized data are compared to those based on individual-level data in simulation studies. We investigate the impact of gene-gene interactions, linkage disequilibrium, and 'weak instruments' on these estimates. Both an inverse-variance weighted average of variant-specific associations and a likelihood-based approach for summarized dat</description><dates><release>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2013 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-19T00:45:56.595Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:48:56Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4377079</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24114802</pubmed><doi>10.1002/gepi.21758</doi></cross_references></HashMap>