{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Beauchamp MK"],"funding":["NICHD NIH HHS","NIA NIH HHS","Canadian Institutes of Health Research"],"pagination":["616-22"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4400398"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["70(5)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Patient-reported and performance-based measures (PBMs) are commonly used to measure physical function in studies of older adults. Selection of appropriate measures to address specific research questions is complex and requires knowledge of relevant psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to examine the predictive validity for adverse outcomes and responsiveness of a widely used patient-reported measure, the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI), compared with PBMs.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed 2 years of follow-up data from Boston RISE, a cohort study of 430 primary care patients aged ≥65 years. Logistic and linear regression models were used to examine predictive validity for adverse outcomes and effect size and minimal detectable change scores w"],"journal":["The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences"],"pubmed_title":["Predictive validity and responsiveness of patient-reported and performance-based measures of function in the Boston RISE study."],"pmcid":["PMC4400398"],"funding_grant_id":["R01 AG032052-03","1K24HD070966-01","K24 HD070966"],"pubmed_authors":["Beauchamp MK","Bean JF","Kurlinski LA","Kiely D","Jette AM","Latham NK","Ward RE"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Predictive validity and responsiveness of patient-reported and performance-based measures of function in the Boston RISE study.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Patient-reported and performance-based measures (PBMs) are commonly used to measure physical function in studies of older adults. Selection of appropriate measures to address specific research questions is complex and requires knowledge of relevant psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to examine the predictive validity for adverse outcomes and responsiveness of a widely used patient-reported measure, the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI), compared with PBMs.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed 2 years of follow-up data from Boston RISE, a cohort study of 430 primary care patients aged ≥65 years. Logistic and linear regression models were used to examine predictive validity for adverse outcomes and effect size and minimal detectable change scores w","dates":{"release":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2015 May","modification":"2025-04-18T16:38:13.106Z","creation":"2019-03-27T01:50:02Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC4400398","cross_references":{"pubmed":["25512569"],"doi":["10.1093/gerona/glu227"]}}