<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Urbach TP</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIH</funding><pagination>79-96</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4438783</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>83</volume><pubmed_abstract>Language interpretation is often assumed to be incremental. However, our studies of quantifier expressions in isolated sentences found N400 event-related brain potential (ERP) evidence for partial but not full immediate quantifier interpretation (Urbach &amp; Kutas, 2010). Here we tested similar quantifier expressions in pragmatically supporting discourse contexts (&lt;i>Alex was an unusual toddler. Most&lt;/i>/&lt;i>Few kids prefer sweets&lt;/i>/&lt;i>vegetables…&lt;/i>) while participants made plausibility judgments (Experiment 1) or read for comprehension (Experiment 2). Control Experiments 3A (plausibility) and 3B (comprehension) removed the discourse contexts. Quantifiers always modulated typical and/or atypical word N400 amplitudes. However, only the real-time N400 effects only in Experiment 2 mirrored offline quantifier and typicality crossover interaction effects for plausibility ratings and cloze probabilities. We conclude that quantifier expressions &lt;i>can&lt;/i> be interpreted fully and immediately, though pragmatic and task variables appear to impact the speed and/or depth of quantifier interpretation.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of memory and language</journal><pubmed_title>Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4438783</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HD022614</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG008313</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HD-22614</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AG-08313</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Urbach TP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kutas M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DeLong KA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.</name><description>Language interpretation is often assumed to be incremental. However, our studies of quantifier expressions in isolated sentences found N400 event-related brain potential (ERP) evidence for partial but not full immediate quantifier interpretation (Urbach &amp; Kutas, 2010). Here we tested similar quantifier expressions in pragmatically supporting discourse contexts (&lt;i>Alex was an unusual toddler. Most&lt;/i>/&lt;i>Few kids prefer sweets&lt;/i>/&lt;i>vegetables…&lt;/i>) while participants made plausibility judgments (Experiment 1) or read for comprehension (Experiment 2). Control Experiments 3A (plausibility) and 3B (comprehension) removed the discourse contexts. Quantifiers always modulated typical and/or atypical word N400 amplitudes. However, only the real-time N400 effects only in Experiment 2 mirrored offline quantifier and typicality crossover interaction effects for plausibility ratings and cloze probabilities. We conclude that quantifier expressions &lt;i>can&lt;/i> be interpreted fully and immediately, though pragmatic and task variables appear to impact the speed and/or depth of quantifier interpretation.</description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015 Aug</publication><modification>2024-11-21T08:58:45.052Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:51:55Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4438783</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26005285</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.010</doi></cross_references></HashMap>