<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10</volume><submitter>IJsbrandy C</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The need for physical cancer rehabilitation programmes (PCRPs), addressing adverse effects from cancer, is growing. Implementing these programmes into daily practice is still a challenge. Since barriers for successful implementation often arise at different levels in healthcare, multi-faceted strategies focusing on multiple levels are likely more effective than single-faceted strategies. Nevertheless, most studies implementing PCRPs used strategies directed at patients only. The aim of this study is to develop and identify the most effective strategy to implement PCRPs into daily care. We want to assess the added value of a multi-faceted strategy compared with a single-faceted patient-directed strategy.&lt;h4>Methods/design&lt;/h4>We will conduct a clustered controlled before </pubmed_abstract><journal>Implementation science : IS</journal><pagination>128</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4562188</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Study protocol: an evaluation of the effectiveness, experiences and costs of a patient-directed strategy compared with a multi-faceted strategy to implement physical cancer rehabilitation programmes for cancer survivors in a European healthcare system; a controlled before and after study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4562188</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ottevanger PB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gerritsen WR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Harten WH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Groen WG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>IJsbrandy C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hermens RP</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Study protocol: an evaluation of the effectiveness, experiences and costs of a patient-directed strategy compared with a multi-faceted strategy to implement physical cancer rehabilitation programmes for cancer survivors in a European healthcare system; a controlled before and after study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The need for physical cancer rehabilitation programmes (PCRPs), addressing adverse effects from cancer, is growing. Implementing these programmes into daily practice is still a challenge. Since barriers for successful implementation often arise at different levels in healthcare, multi-faceted strategies focusing on multiple levels are likely more effective than single-faceted strategies. Nevertheless, most studies implementing PCRPs used strategies directed at patients only. The aim of this study is to develop and identify the most effective strategy to implement PCRPs into daily care. We want to assess the added value of a multi-faceted strategy compared with a single-faceted patient-directed strategy.&lt;h4>Methods/design&lt;/h4>We will conduct a clustered controlled before </description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-05T09:57:26.09Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:58:01Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4562188</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26345182</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13012-015-0312-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>