<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ravi P</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>331-8</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4566003</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Approximately a quarter of men with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) have a residual mass, typically in the retroperitoneum, after chemotherapy. The management of small residual masses (≤1 cm) is controversial, with good outcomes seen with either post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) or surveillance. We sought to review our experience of surveillance and synthesize the cumulative findings with the current literature in the form of a meta-analysis.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>We searched PubMed, EMBASE and abstracts from ASCO and AUA to identify relevant, English-language studies for the meta-analysis. The DFCI (Dana Farber Cancer Institute) database was constructed from a database of men undergoing cisplatin-based chemother</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology</journal><pubmed_title>A meta-analysis of patient outcomes with subcentimeter disease after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumor.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4566003</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32 CA009172</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gray KP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Donnell EK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ravi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sweeney CJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A meta-analysis of patient outcomes with subcentimeter disease after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumor.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Approximately a quarter of men with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) have a residual mass, typically in the retroperitoneum, after chemotherapy. The management of small residual masses (≤1 cm) is controversial, with good outcomes seen with either post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) or surveillance. We sought to review our experience of surveillance and synthesize the cumulative findings with the current literature in the form of a meta-analysis.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>We searched PubMed, EMBASE and abstracts from ASCO and AUA to identify relevant, English-language studies for the meta-analysis. The DFCI (Dana Farber Cancer Institute) database was constructed from a database of men undergoing cisplatin-based chemother</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014 Feb</publication><modification>2026-05-07T17:57:31.447Z</modification><creation>2026-04-07T23:02:55.909Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4566003</accession><cross_references><pubmed>24276027</pubmed><doi>10.1093/annonc/mdt425</doi></cross_references></HashMap>