<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ahmad T</submitter><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>8</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4581514</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The use of cardiac output monitoring may improve patient outcomes after major surgery. However, little is known about the use of this technology across nations.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This is a secondary analysis of a previously published observational study. Patients aged 16 years and over undergoing major non-cardiac surgery in a 7-day period in April 2011 were included into this analysis. The objective is to describe prevalence and type of cardiac output monitoring used in major surgery in Europe.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Included in the analysis were 12,170 patients from the surgical services of 426 hospitals in 28 European nations. One thousand four hundred and sixteen patients (11.6 %) were exposed to cardiac output monitoring, and 2343 patients (19.3 %) received a central venous ca</pubmed_abstract><journal>Perioperative medicine (London, England)</journal><pubmed_title>Variation in haemodynamic monitoring for major surgery in European nations: secondary analysis of the EuSOS dataset.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4581514</pmcid><funding_grant_id>RP_2014-04-022</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CS/08/08/17</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Moreno RP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aldecoa C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pearse RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beilstein CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofer CK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmad T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rhodes A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molnar Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sander M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Novak-Jankovic V</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Variation in haemodynamic monitoring for major surgery in European nations: secondary analysis of the EuSOS dataset.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The use of cardiac output monitoring may improve patient outcomes after major surgery. However, little is known about the use of this technology across nations.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This is a secondary analysis of a previously published observational study. Patients aged 16 years and over undergoing major non-cardiac surgery in a 7-day period in April 2011 were included into this analysis. The objective is to describe prevalence and type of cardiac output monitoring used in major surgery in Europe.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Included in the analysis were 12,170 patients from the surgical services of 426 hospitals in 28 European nations. One thousand four hundred and sixteen patients (11.6 %) were exposed to cardiac output monitoring, and 2343 patients (19.3 %) received a central venous ca</description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015</publication><modification>2026-06-10T07:49:59.824Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T22:33:06Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4581514</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26405521</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13741-015-0018-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>