<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Bartlett JW</submitter><funding>Economic and Social Research Council</funding><funding>US National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>United Kingdom Medical Research Council</funding><funding>US National Institute of Mental Health</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>National Institute of Mental Health</funding><pagination>730-6</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4597800</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>182(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Missing data are a commonly occurring threat to the validity and efficiency of epidemiologic studies. Perhaps the most common approach to handling missing data is to simply drop those records with 1 or more missing values, in so-called "complete records" or "complete case" analysis. In this paper, we bring together earlier-derived yet perhaps now somewhat neglected results which show that a logistic regression complete records analysis can provide asymptotically unbiased estimates of the association of an exposure of interest with an outcome, adjusted for a number of confounders, under a surprisingly wide range of missing-data assumptions. We give detailed guidance describing how the observed data can be used to judge the plausibility of these assumptions. The results mean that in large ep</pubmed_abstract><journal>American journal of epidemiology</journal><pubmed_title>Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation of Exposure Odds Ratios in Complete Records Logistic Regression.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4597800</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MC_UU_12023/21</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01MH087219</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>G0900724</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/K02180X/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 MH087219</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ES/G026300/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Harel O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carpenter JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bartlett JW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation of Exposure Odds Ratios in Complete Records Logistic Regression.</name><description>Missing data are a commonly occurring threat to the validity and efficiency of epidemiologic studies. Perhaps the most common approach to handling missing data is to simply drop those records with 1 or more missing values, in so-called "complete records" or "complete case" analysis. In this paper, we bring together earlier-derived yet perhaps now somewhat neglected results which show that a logistic regression complete records analysis can provide asymptotically unbiased estimates of the association of an exposure of interest with an outcome, adjusted for a number of confounders, under a surprisingly wide range of missing-data assumptions. We give detailed guidance describing how the observed data can be used to judge the plausibility of these assumptions. The results mean that in large ep</description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:50:21.175Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T01:59:43Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4597800</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26429998</pubmed><doi>10.1093/aje/kwv114</doi></cross_references></HashMap>