<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Lemiale V</submitter><funding>Fisher &amp;amp; Paykel</funding><pagination>380</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4629403</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>19</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>In immunocompromised patients, acute respiratory failure (ARF) is associated with high mortality, particularly when invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is required. In patients with severe hypoxemia, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy has been used as an alternative to delivery of oxygen via a Venturi mask. Our objective in the present study was to compare HFNO and Venturi mask oxygen in immunocompromised patients with ARF.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial in four intensive care units. Inclusion criteria were hypoxemic ARF and immunosuppression, defined as at least one of the following: solid or hematological malignancy, steroid or other immunosuppressant drug therapy, and HIV infection. Exclusion criteria were </pubmed_abstract><journal>Critical care (London, England)</journal><pubmed_title>The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4629403</pmcid><funding_grant_id>provide oxygen and HFNC devices</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Azoulay E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Demoule A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mayaux J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rabbat A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lemiale V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lambert J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mokart D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>In immunocompromised patients, acute respiratory failure (ARF) is associated with high mortality, particularly when invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is required. In patients with severe hypoxemia, high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy has been used as an alternative to delivery of oxygen via a Venturi mask. Our objective in the present study was to compare HFNO and Venturi mask oxygen in immunocompromised patients with ARF.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial in four intensive care units. Inclusion criteria were hypoxemic ARF and immunosuppression, defined as at least one of the following: solid or hematological malignancy, steroid or other immunosuppressant drug therapy, and HIV infection. Exclusion criteria were </description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015 Nov</publication><modification>2025-05-31T23:30:32.472Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:01:10Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4629403</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26521922</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13054-015-1097-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>