{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["2(1)"],"submitter":["Zhang B"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>An estimated 170 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV genotype 4 (HCV-4)-the most prevalent hepatitis C strain in the Middle East and Africa-is difficult to treat, with an estimated sustained virological response (SVR) of 53% when using pegylated interferon and ribavirin (P/R) in treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. In regions where access to direct-acting antivirals is limited, re-treatment of patients who failed therapy with another course of P/R may be an option if the success rate is acceptable.<h4>Objectives</h4>We aimed to determine the SVR from retreatment with P/R in treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE and EMBASE searches, and by reviewing article bibliographies and abstracts from recent Liver Society Meetings. Original studies featuring at least 10 adult, treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection failing prior interferon-based therapy and receiving subsequent re-treatment with P/R were included.<h4>Results</h4>3 studies were included. Overall pooled SVR was 32.7%, or 41/126 patients. No significant heterogeneity existed among the studies. One study reported higher SVR of 50% in previous relapsers, compared with 23% in previous non-responders.<h4>Conclusions</h4>As expected, treatment-experienced patients achieved lower rate of SVR compared with previously reported SVR for treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. The abysmal rate of success from re-treatment with P/R supports the use of direct-acting antivirals whenever re-treatment is considered, even in resource-limited regions."],"journal":["BMJ open gastroenterology"],"pagination":["e000057"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4650907"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Re-treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection with pegylated interferon and ribavirin: a meta-analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC4650907"],"pubmed_authors":["Yip B","Yee BE","Nguyen NH","Zhang B","Nguyen MH"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Re-treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection with pegylated interferon and ribavirin: a meta-analysis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>An estimated 170 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV genotype 4 (HCV-4)-the most prevalent hepatitis C strain in the Middle East and Africa-is difficult to treat, with an estimated sustained virological response (SVR) of 53% when using pegylated interferon and ribavirin (P/R) in treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. In regions where access to direct-acting antivirals is limited, re-treatment of patients who failed therapy with another course of P/R may be an option if the success rate is acceptable.<h4>Objectives</h4>We aimed to determine the SVR from retreatment with P/R in treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE and EMBASE searches, and by reviewing article bibliographies and abstracts from recent Liver Society Meetings. Original studies featuring at least 10 adult, treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection failing prior interferon-based therapy and receiving subsequent re-treatment with P/R were included.<h4>Results</h4>3 studies were included. Overall pooled SVR was 32.7%, or 41/126 patients. No significant heterogeneity existed among the studies. One study reported higher SVR of 50% in previous relapsers, compared with 23% in previous non-responders.<h4>Conclusions</h4>As expected, treatment-experienced patients achieved lower rate of SVR compared with previously reported SVR for treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. The abysmal rate of success from re-treatment with P/R supports the use of direct-acting antivirals whenever re-treatment is considered, even in resource-limited regions.","dates":{"release":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2015","modification":"2025-04-04T07:52:04.971Z","creation":"2019-03-27T02:02:19Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC4650907","cross_references":{"pubmed":["26629360"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000057"]}}