<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2(1)</volume><submitter>Zhang B</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>An estimated 170 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV genotype 4 (HCV-4)-the most prevalent hepatitis C strain in the Middle East and Africa-is difficult to treat, with an estimated sustained virological response (SVR) of 53% when using pegylated interferon and ribavirin (P/R) in treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. In regions where access to direct-acting antivirals is limited, re-treatment of patients who failed therapy with another course of P/R may be an option if the success rate is acceptable.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>We aimed to determine the SVR from retreatment with P/R in treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE and EMBASE searches, and by reviewing article bibliographies and abstracts from recent Liver Society Meetings. Original studies featuring at least 10 adult, treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection failing prior interferon-based therapy and receiving subsequent re-treatment with P/R were included.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>3 studies were included. Overall pooled SVR was 32.7%, or 41/126 patients. No significant heterogeneity existed among the studies. One study reported higher SVR of 50% in previous relapsers, compared with 23% in previous non-responders.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>As expected, treatment-experienced patients achieved lower rate of SVR compared with previously reported SVR for treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. The abysmal rate of success from re-treatment with P/R supports the use of direct-acting antivirals whenever re-treatment is considered, even in resource-limited regions.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open gastroenterology</journal><pagination>e000057</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4650907</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Re-treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection with pegylated interferon and ribavirin: a meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4650907</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Yip B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yee BE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nguyen NH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nguyen MH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Re-treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection with pegylated interferon and ribavirin: a meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>An estimated 170 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV genotype 4 (HCV-4)-the most prevalent hepatitis C strain in the Middle East and Africa-is difficult to treat, with an estimated sustained virological response (SVR) of 53% when using pegylated interferon and ribavirin (P/R) in treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. In regions where access to direct-acting antivirals is limited, re-treatment of patients who failed therapy with another course of P/R may be an option if the success rate is acceptable.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>We aimed to determine the SVR from retreatment with P/R in treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE and EMBASE searches, and by reviewing article bibliographies and abstracts from recent Liver Society Meetings. Original studies featuring at least 10 adult, treatment-experienced patients with HCV-4 infection failing prior interferon-based therapy and receiving subsequent re-treatment with P/R were included.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>3 studies were included. Overall pooled SVR was 32.7%, or 41/126 patients. No significant heterogeneity existed among the studies. One study reported higher SVR of 50% in previous relapsers, compared with 23% in previous non-responders.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>As expected, treatment-experienced patients achieved lower rate of SVR compared with previously reported SVR for treatment-naïve patients with HCV-4 infection. The abysmal rate of success from re-treatment with P/R supports the use of direct-acting antivirals whenever re-treatment is considered, even in resource-limited regions.</description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015</publication><modification>2025-04-04T07:52:04.971Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:02:19Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4650907</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26629360</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000057</doi></cross_references></HashMap>