<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>39(2)</volume><submitter>Klein K</submitter><funding>EBE</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction and objective&lt;/h4>Pharmacovigilance requirements for biologics mandate that EU Member States shall ensure that any biologic that is the subject of a suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) is identifiable by brand name and batch number. Recent studies showed that brand name identification is well established, whereas batch numbers are (still) poorly reported. We evaluated information-recording systems and practices in the Dutch hospital setting to identify determinants for brand name and batch number recording as well as success factors and bottlenecks for traceability.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We surveyed Dutch hospital pharmacists with an online questionnaire on systems and practices in hospitals for recording brand names and batch numbers. Additionally, we performed an analysis of </pubmed_abstract><journal>Drug safety</journal><pagination>185-92</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4735237</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Traceability of Biologics in The Netherlands: An Analysis of Information-Recording Systems in Clinical Practice and Spontaneous ADR Reports.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4735237</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Broekmans AW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Bruin ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klein K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vermeer NS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stolk P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Puijenbroek EP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scholl JH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Traceability of Biologics in The Netherlands: An Analysis of Information-Recording Systems in Clinical Practice and Spontaneous ADR Reports.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction and objective&lt;/h4>Pharmacovigilance requirements for biologics mandate that EU Member States shall ensure that any biologic that is the subject of a suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) is identifiable by brand name and batch number. Recent studies showed that brand name identification is well established, whereas batch numbers are (still) poorly reported. We evaluated information-recording systems and practices in the Dutch hospital setting to identify determinants for brand name and batch number recording as well as success factors and bottlenecks for traceability.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We surveyed Dutch hospital pharmacists with an online questionnaire on systems and practices in hospitals for recording brand names and batch numbers. Additionally, we performed an analysis of </description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T18:59:34.19Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:07:58Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4735237</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26719190</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s40264-015-0383-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>