<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4</volume><submitter>Vavrek MJ</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Cluster analysis is one of the most commonly used methods in palaeoecological studies, particularly in studies investigating biogeographic patterns. Although a number of different clustering methods are widely used, the approach and underlying assumptions of many of these methods are quite different. For example, methods may be hierarchical or non-hierarchical in their approaches, and may use Euclidean distance or non-Euclidean indices to cluster the data. In order to assess the effectiveness of the different clustering methods as compared to one another, a simulation was designed that could assess each method over a range of both cluster distinctiveness and sampling intensity. Additionally, a non-hierarchical, non-Euclidean, iterative clustering method implemented in the R Statistical Lan</pubmed_abstract><journal>PeerJ</journal><pagination>e1720</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4782735</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A comparison of clustering methods for biogeography with fossil datasets.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4782735</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Vavrek MJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A comparison of clustering methods for biogeography with fossil datasets.</name><description>Cluster analysis is one of the most commonly used methods in palaeoecological studies, particularly in studies investigating biogeographic patterns. Although a number of different clustering methods are widely used, the approach and underlying assumptions of many of these methods are quite different. For example, methods may be hierarchical or non-hierarchical in their approaches, and may use Euclidean distance or non-Euclidean indices to cluster the data. In order to assess the effectiveness of the different clustering methods as compared to one another, a simulation was designed that could assess each method over a range of both cluster distinctiveness and sampling intensity. Additionally, a non-hierarchical, non-Euclidean, iterative clustering method implemented in the R Statistical Lan</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016</publication><modification>2025-04-05T10:27:54.137Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:10:39Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4782735</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26966658</pubmed><doi>10.7717/peerj.1720</doi></cross_references></HashMap>