<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>100(2)</volume><submitter>Braulke F</submitter><pubmed_abstract>International Prognostic Scoring Systems are used to determine the individual risk profile of myelodysplastic syndrome patients. For the assessment of International Prognostic Scoring Systems, an adequate chromosome banding analysis of the bone marrow is essential. Cytogenetic information is not available for a substantial number of patients (5%-20%) with dry marrow or an insufficient number of metaphase cells. For these patients, a valid risk classification is impossible. In the study presented here, the International Prognostic Scoring Systems were validated based on fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses using extended probe panels applied to cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34(+)) peripheral blood cells of 328 MDS patients of our prospective multicenter German diagnostic </pubmed_abstract><journal>Haematologica</journal><pagination>205-13</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4803133</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Validation of cytogenetic risk groups according to International Prognostic Scoring Systems by peripheral blood CD34+FISH: results from a German diagnostic study in comparison with an international control group.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4803133</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Pfeilstocker M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mallo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hildebrandt B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brummendorf TH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haase D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bennett JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muller-Thomas C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schanz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slovak ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valent P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lubbert M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shirneshan K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fonatsch C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nosslinger T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gotze K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trumper L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stauder R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Platzbecker U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenberg PL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sole F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Germing U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ohyashiki K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aul C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Beau MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofmann WK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giagounidis AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braulke F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nolte F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tuchler H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sperr WR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Validation of cytogenetic risk groups according to International Prognostic Scoring Systems by peripheral blood CD34+FISH: results from a German diagnostic study in comparison with an international control group.</name><description>International Prognostic Scoring Systems are used to determine the individual risk profile of myelodysplastic syndrome patients. For the assessment of International Prognostic Scoring Systems, an adequate chromosome banding analysis of the bone marrow is essential. Cytogenetic information is not available for a substantial number of patients (5%-20%) with dry marrow or an insufficient number of metaphase cells. For these patients, a valid risk classification is impossible. In the study presented here, the International Prognostic Scoring Systems were validated based on fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses using extended probe panels applied to cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34(+)) peripheral blood cells of 328 MDS patients of our prospective multicenter German diagnostic </description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015 Feb</publication><modification>2025-05-29T21:25:25.133Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T03:10:04Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4803133</accession><cross_references><pubmed>25344522</pubmed><doi>10.3324/haematol.2014.110452</doi></cross_references></HashMap>