<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Maguire KC</submitter><funding>Division of Environmental Biology</funding><pagination>20152817</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4810853</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>283(1826)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Species distribution models (SDMs) assume species exist in isolation and do not influence one another's distributions, thus potentially limiting their ability to predict biodiversity patterns. Community-level models (CLMs) capitalize on species co-occurrences to fit shared environmental responses of species and communities, and therefore may result in more robust and transferable models. Here, we conduct a controlled comparison of five paired SDMs and CLMs across changing climates, using palaeoclimatic simulations and fossil-pollen records of eastern North America for the past 21 000 years. Both SDMs and CLMs performed poorly when projected to time periods that are temporally distant and climatically dissimilar from those in which they were fit; however, CLMs generally outperformed SDMs in</pubmed_abstract><journal>Proceedings. Biological sciences</journal><pubmed_title>Controlled comparison of species- and community-level models across novel climates and communities.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4810853</pmcid><funding_grant_id>DEB-1257508</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DEB-1257164</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DEB-1257033</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Nieto-Lugilde D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitzpatrick MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maguire KC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blois JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrier S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lorenz DJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Controlled comparison of species- and community-level models across novel climates and communities.</name><description>Species distribution models (SDMs) assume species exist in isolation and do not influence one another's distributions, thus potentially limiting their ability to predict biodiversity patterns. Community-level models (CLMs) capitalize on species co-occurrences to fit shared environmental responses of species and communities, and therefore may result in more robust and transferable models. Here, we conduct a controlled comparison of five paired SDMs and CLMs across changing climates, using palaeoclimatic simulations and fossil-pollen records of eastern North America for the past 21 000 years. Both SDMs and CLMs performed poorly when projected to time periods that are temporally distant and climatically dissimilar from those in which they were fit; however, CLMs generally outperformed SDMs in</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-22T12:06:11.011Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T22:42:37Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4810853</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26962143</pubmed><doi>10.1098/rspb.2015.2817</doi></cross_references></HashMap>