<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rattanabannakit C</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCRR NIH HHS</funding><funding>NLM NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1145-55</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4833578</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>51(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>BACKGROUND:The perception of cognitive decline by individuals and those who know them well ("informants") has been inconsistently associated with objective cognitive performance, but strongly associated with depressive symptoms. OBJECTIVE:We investigated associations of self-report, informant-report, and discrepancy between self- and informant-report of cognitive decline obtained from the Cognitive Change Index (CCI) with cognitive test performance and self-reported depressive symptoms. METHODS:267 participants with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or mild dementia were included from a cohort study and memory clinic. Association of test performance and self-rated depression (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS) with CCI scores obtained from subjects (CCI-S), their informants (CCI-I), and discrepancy scores between subjects and informants (CCI-D; CCI-S minus CCI-I) were analyzed using correlation and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. RESULTS:CCI-S and CCI-I scores showed high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.96 and 0.98, respectively). Higher scores on CCI-S and CCI-I, and lower scores on the CCI-D, were associated with lower performance on various cognitive tests in both univariate and in ANCOVA models adjusted for age, gender, and education. Adjustment for GDS slightly weakened the relationships between CCI and test performance but most remained significant. CONCLUSION:Self- and informant-report of cognitive decline, as measured by the CCI, show moderately strong relationships with objective test performance independent of age, gender, education, and depressive symptoms. The CCI appears to be a valid cross-sectional measure of self and informant perception of cognitive decline across the continuum of functioning. Studies are needed to address the relationship of CCI scores to longitudinal outcome.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD</journal><pubmed_title>The Cognitive Change Index as a Measure of Self and Informant Perception of Cognitive Decline: Relation to Neuropsychological Tests.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4833578</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K01 AG049050</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG10133</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 RR025761</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010133</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 LM011384</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>C06 RR020128</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K02 AG048240</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG019771</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001108</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG040770</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RR020128</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG19771</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>S10 RR027710</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 RR025761</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 LM011360</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RR027710-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG045157</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Apostolova LG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saykin AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farlow MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lane KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McDonald BC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Risacher SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Unverzagt FW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rattanabannakit C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gao S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Cognitive Change Index as a Measure of Self and Informant Perception of Cognitive Decline: Relation to Neuropsychological Tests.</name><description>BACKGROUND:The perception of cognitive decline by individuals and those who know them well ("informants") has been inconsistently associated with objective cognitive performance, but strongly associated with depressive symptoms. OBJECTIVE:We investigated associations of self-report, informant-report, and discrepancy between self- and informant-report of cognitive decline obtained from the Cognitive Change Index (CCI) with cognitive test performance and self-reported depressive symptoms. METHODS:267 participants with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or mild dementia were included from a cohort study and memory clinic. Association of test performance and self-rated depression (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS) with CCI scores obtained from subjects (CCI-S), their informants (CCI-I), and discrepancy scores between subjects and informants (CCI-D; CCI-S minus CCI-I) were analyzed using correlation and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. RESULTS:CCI-S and CCI-I scores showed high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.96 and 0.98, respectively). Higher scores on CCI-S and CCI-I, and lower scores on the CCI-D, were associated with lower performance on various cognitive tests in both univariate and in ANCOVA models adjusted for age, gender, and education. Adjustment for GDS slightly weakened the relationships between CCI and test performance but most remained significant. CONCLUSION:Self- and informant-report of cognitive decline, as measured by the CCI, show moderately strong relationships with objective test performance independent of age, gender, education, and depressive symptoms. The CCI appears to be a valid cross-sectional measure of self and informant perception of cognitive decline across the continuum of functioning. Studies are needed to address the relationship of CCI scores to longitudinal outcome.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016</publication><modification>2020-10-29T13:18:19Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:11:40Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4833578</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26923008</pubmed><doi>10.3233/jad-150729</doi><doi>10.3233/JAD-150729</doi></cross_references></HashMap>