<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>40</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><submitter>Lee H</submitter><funding>NIDCR NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1456-65</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4845099</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) papain-like protease (PLpro) blocking loop 2 (BL2) structure differs significantly from that of SARS-CoV PLpro, where it has been proven to play a crucial role in SARS-CoV PLpro inhibitor binding. Four SARS-CoV PLpro lead inhibitors were tested against MERS-CoV PLpro, none of which were effective against MERS-CoV PLpro. Structure and sequence alignments revealed that two residues, Y269 and Q270, responsible for inhibitor binding to SARS-CoV PLpro, were replaced by T274 and A275 in MERS-CoV PLpro, making critical binding interactions difficult to form for similar types of inhibitors. High-throughput screening (HTS) of 25 000 compounds against both PLpro enzymes identified a small fragment-like noncovalent dual inhibitor. Mode of inhibition studies by enzyme kinetics and competition surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analyses suggested that this compound acts as a competitive inhibitor with an IC50 of 6 μM against MERS-CoV PLpro, indicating that it binds to the active site, whereas it acts as an allosteric inhibitor against SARS-CoV PLpro with an IC50 of 11 μM. These results raised the possibility that inhibitor recognition specificity of MERS-CoV PLpro may differ from that of SARS-CoV PLpro. In addition, inhibitory activity of this compound was selective for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV PLpro enzymes over two human homologues, the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases 1 and 3 (hUCH-L1 and hUCH-L3).</pubmed_abstract><journal>ACS chemical biology</journal><pubmed_title>Inhibitor recognition specificity of MERS-CoV papain-like protease may differ from that of SARS-CoV.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4845099</pmcid><funding_grant_id>T32 DE018381</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R37 GM053386</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R56 AI089535</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32-DE018381</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Santarsiero BD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lei H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gatuz JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cao S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ojeda I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rice AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szypulinski MZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghosh AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel K</pubmed_authors><view_count>40</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Inhibitor recognition specificity of MERS-CoV papain-like protease may differ from that of SARS-CoV.</name><description>The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) papain-like protease (PLpro) blocking loop 2 (BL2) structure differs significantly from that of SARS-CoV PLpro, where it has been proven to play a crucial role in SARS-CoV PLpro inhibitor binding. Four SARS-CoV PLpro lead inhibitors were tested against MERS-CoV PLpro, none of which were effective against MERS-CoV PLpro. Structure and sequence alignments revealed that two residues, Y269 and Q270, responsible for inhibitor binding to SARS-CoV PLpro, were replaced by T274 and A275 in MERS-CoV PLpro, making critical binding interactions difficult to form for similar types of inhibitors. High-throughput screening (HTS) of 25 000 compounds against both PLpro enzymes identified a small fragment-like noncovalent dual inhibitor. Mode of inhibition studies by enzyme kinetics and competition surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analyses suggested that this compound acts as a competitive inhibitor with an IC50 of 6 μM against MERS-CoV PLpro, indicating that it binds to the active site, whereas it acts as an allosteric inhibitor against SARS-CoV PLpro with an IC50 of 11 μM. These results raised the possibility that inhibitor recognition specificity of MERS-CoV PLpro may differ from that of SARS-CoV PLpro. In addition, inhibitory activity of this compound was selective for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV PLpro enzymes over two human homologues, the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases 1 and 3 (hUCH-L1 and hUCH-L3).</description><dates><release>2015-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2015 Jun</publication><modification>2022-02-11T10:33:20.141Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:12:24Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4845099</accession><cross_references><pubmed>25746232</pubmed><doi>10.1021/cb500917m</doi></cross_references></HashMap>