<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Volz LJ</submitter><funding>German Research Foundation</funding><funding>Helmholtz Initiative on Systems-Biology ‘The Human Brain Model’</funding><funding>Marga and Walter Boll Stiftung</funding><funding>NIH</funding><funding>University of Cologne</funding><funding>German Excellence Initiative</funding><funding>University of Cologne Emerging Groups Initiative (CONNECT group)</funding><pagination>2882-2894</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4869817</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Neural plasticity is a major factor driving cortical reorganization after stroke. We here tested whether repetitively enhancing motor cortex plasticity by means of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) prior to physiotherapy might promote recovery of function early after stroke. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to elucidate underlying neural mechanisms. Twenty-six hospitalized, first-ever stroke patients (time since stroke: 1-16 days) with hand motor deficits were enrolled in a sham-controlled design and pseudo-randomized into 2 groups. iTBS was administered prior to physiotherapy on 5 consecutive days either over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1-stimulation group) or parieto-occipital vertex (control-stimulation group). Hand motor function, cortical excitability, and resting-state fMRI were assessed 1 day prior to the first stimulation and 1 day after the last stimulation. Recovery of grip strength was significantly stronger in the M1-stimulation compared to the control-stimulation group. Higher levels of motor network connectivity were associated with better motor outcome. Consistently, control-stimulated patients featured a decrease in intra- and interhemispheric connectivity of the motor network, which was absent in the M1-stimulation group. Hence, adding iTBS to prime physiotherapy in recovering stroke patients seems to interfere with motor network degradation, possibly reflecting alleviation of post-stroke diaschisis.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)</journal><pubmed_title>Shaping Early Reorganization of Neural Networks Promotes Motor Function after Stroke.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4869817</pmcid><funding_grant_id>3285/2-1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01-MH074457</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Rehme AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grefkes C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michely J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eickhoff SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fink GR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Volz LJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nettekoven C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Shaping Early Reorganization of Neural Networks Promotes Motor Function after Stroke.</name><description>Neural plasticity is a major factor driving cortical reorganization after stroke. We here tested whether repetitively enhancing motor cortex plasticity by means of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) prior to physiotherapy might promote recovery of function early after stroke. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to elucidate underlying neural mechanisms. Twenty-six hospitalized, first-ever stroke patients (time since stroke: 1-16 days) with hand motor deficits were enrolled in a sham-controlled design and pseudo-randomized into 2 groups. iTBS was administered prior to physiotherapy on 5 consecutive days either over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1-stimulation group) or parieto-occipital vertex (control-stimulation group). Hand motor function, cortical excitability, and resting-state fMRI were assessed 1 day prior to the first stimulation and 1 day after the last stimulation. Recovery of grip strength was significantly stronger in the M1-stimulation compared to the control-stimulation group. Higher levels of motor network connectivity were associated with better motor outcome. Consistently, control-stimulated patients featured a decrease in intra- and interhemispheric connectivity of the motor network, which was absent in the M1-stimulation group. Hence, adding iTBS to prime physiotherapy in recovering stroke patients seems to interfere with motor network degradation, possibly reflecting alleviation of post-stroke diaschisis.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-04T09:36:32.433Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:13:53Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4869817</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26980614</pubmed><doi>10.1093/cercor/bhw034</doi></cross_references></HashMap>