<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kantarjian HM</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2670-7</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4874148</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(21)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of decitabine with treatment choice (TC) in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Patients (N = 485) age ≥ 65 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive decitabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TC (supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end point was the complete remission (CR) rate plus the CR rate without platelet recovery (CRp). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>T</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4874148</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016672</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 CA100632</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Mayer J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lysak D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomas XG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Minden M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chou WC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dmoszynska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cermak J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuo CY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arthur C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kantarjian HM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faderl S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delaunay J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oriol A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wierzbowska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazur G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buckstein R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gau JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ravandi F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of decitabine with treatment choice (TC) in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Patients (N = 485) age ≥ 65 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive decitabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TC (supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m(2) per day as a subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end point was the complete remission (CR) rate plus the CR rate without platelet recovery (CRp). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>T</description><dates><release>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2012 Jul</publication><modification>2026-05-30T14:00:27.184Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:14:10Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4874148</accession><cross_references><pubmed>22689805</pubmed><doi>10.1200/jco.2011.38.9429</doi><doi>10.1200/JCO.2011.38.9429</doi></cross_references></HashMap>