<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Flood VH</submitter><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2481-8</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4874228</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>127(20)</volume><pubmed_abstract>von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, and type 1 VWD is the most common VWD variant. Despite its frequency, diagnosis of type 1 VWD remains the subject of debate. In order to study the spectrum of type 1 VWD in the United States, the Zimmerman Program enrolled 482 subjects with a previous diagnosis of type 1 VWD without stringent laboratory diagnostic criteria. von Willebrand factor (VWF) laboratory testing and full-length VWF gene sequencing was performed for all index cases and healthy control subjects in a central laboratory. Bleeding phenotype was characterized using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool. At study entry, 64% of subjects had VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) or VWF ristocetin cofactor activity below th</pubmed_abstract><journal>Blood</journal><pubmed_title>Clinical and laboratory variability in a cohort of patients diagnosed with type 1 VWD in the United States.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4874228</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HL112614</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K08 HL102260</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 HL081588</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hoots WK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peake IR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoffmann RG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shapiro AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manco-Johnson MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Flood VH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Udani RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Christopherson PA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leissinger C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lentz SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lillicrap D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montgomery KT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abshire TC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bellissimo DB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Friedman KD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dasgupta M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>James PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ragni MV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boggio LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goodeve AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haberichter SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montgomery RR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lusher JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gill JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gruppo RA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical and laboratory variability in a cohort of patients diagnosed with type 1 VWD in the United States.</name><description>von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, and type 1 VWD is the most common VWD variant. Despite its frequency, diagnosis of type 1 VWD remains the subject of debate. In order to study the spectrum of type 1 VWD in the United States, the Zimmerman Program enrolled 482 subjects with a previous diagnosis of type 1 VWD without stringent laboratory diagnostic criteria. von Willebrand factor (VWF) laboratory testing and full-length VWF gene sequencing was performed for all index cases and healthy control subjects in a central laboratory. Bleeding phenotype was characterized using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding assessment tool. At study entry, 64% of subjects had VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) or VWF ristocetin cofactor activity below th</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 May</publication><modification>2025-06-01T04:17:46.504Z</modification><creation>2019-06-06T15:50:11Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4874228</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26862110</pubmed><doi>10.1182/blood-2015-10-673681</doi></cross_references></HashMap>