<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(7)</volume><submitter>Cesuroglu T</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Various terms and definitions are used to describe personalised approaches to medicine and healthcare, but in ambiguous and inconsistent ways. They mostly have been defined in a top-down manner. However, actual practices might take different paths. Here, we aimed to provide a 'practice-based' perspective on the debate by analysing the content of 'personalised' practices published in the literature.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The search in PubMed and EMBASE (April 2014) using the terms frequently used for personalised approaches resulted in 5333 records. 2 independent researchers used different strategies for screening, resulting in 157 articles describing 88 'personalised' practices that were implemented/presented on at least 1 individual/patient case. The content analysis was groun</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e010243</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4947721</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Other side of the coin for personalised medicine and healthcare: content analysis of 'personalised' practices in the literature.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4947721</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Feron F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Syurina E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krumeich A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cesuroglu T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Other side of the coin for personalised medicine and healthcare: content analysis of 'personalised' practices in the literature.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>Various terms and definitions are used to describe personalised approaches to medicine and healthcare, but in ambiguous and inconsistent ways. They mostly have been defined in a top-down manner. However, actual practices might take different paths. Here, we aimed to provide a 'practice-based' perspective on the debate by analysing the content of 'personalised' practices published in the literature.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The search in PubMed and EMBASE (April 2014) using the terms frequently used for personalised approaches resulted in 5333 records. 2 independent researchers used different strategies for screening, resulting in 157 articles describing 88 'personalised' practices that were implemented/presented on at least 1 individual/patient case. The content analysis was groun</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Jul</publication><modification>2026-07-15T22:11:19.752Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:20:25.378Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4947721</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27412099</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010243</doi></cross_references></HashMap>