<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Korwar S</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2707-15</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4993153</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP) is a transcriptional co-regulator that downregulates the expression of many tumor-suppressor genes. Utilizing a crystal structure of CtBP with its substrate 4-methylthio-2-oxobutyric acid (MTOB) and NAD(+) as a guide, we have designed, synthesized, and tested a series of small molecule inhibitors of CtBP. From our first round of compounds, we identified 2-(hydroxyimino)-3-phenylpropanoic acid as a potent CtBP inhibitor (IC50=0.24?M). A structure-activity relationship study of this compound further identified the 4-chloro- (IC50=0.18?M) and 3-chloro- (IC50=0.17?M) analogues as additional potent CtBP inhibitors. Evaluation of the hydroxyimine analogues in a short-term cell growth/viability assay showed that the 4-chloro- and 3-chloro-analogues are 2-fold and 4-fold more potent, respectively, than the MTOB control. A functional cellular assay using a CtBP-specific transcriptional readout revealed that the 4-chloro- and 3-chloro-hydroxyimine analogues were able to block CtBP transcriptional repression activity. This data suggests that substrate-competitive inhibition of CtBP dehydrogenase activity is a potential mechanism to reactivate tumor-suppressor gene expression as a therapeutic strategy for cancer.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Bioorganic &amp; medicinal chemistry</journal><pubmed_title>Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of substrate-competitive inhibitors of C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP).</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4993153</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA016059</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Ellis KC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coover RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kellogg GE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Korwar S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Love IM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grossman SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parikh HI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Royer WE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doughty TW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hilbert BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morris BL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of substrate-competitive inhibitors of C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP).</name><description>C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP) is a transcriptional co-regulator that downregulates the expression of many tumor-suppressor genes. Utilizing a crystal structure of CtBP with its substrate 4-methylthio-2-oxobutyric acid (MTOB) and NAD(+) as a guide, we have designed, synthesized, and tested a series of small molecule inhibitors of CtBP. From our first round of compounds, we identified 2-(hydroxyimino)-3-phenylpropanoic acid as a potent CtBP inhibitor (IC50=0.24?M). A structure-activity relationship study of this compound further identified the 4-chloro- (IC50=0.18?M) and 3-chloro- (IC50=0.17?M) analogues as additional potent CtBP inhibitors. Evaluation of the hydroxyimine analogues in a short-term cell growth/viability assay showed that the 4-chloro- and 3-chloro-analogues are 2-fold and 4-fold more potent, respectively, than the MTOB control. A functional cellular assay using a CtBP-specific transcriptional readout revealed that the 4-chloro- and 3-chloro-hydroxyimine analogues were able to block CtBP transcriptional repression activity. This data suggests that substrate-competitive inhibition of CtBP dehydrogenase activity is a potential mechanism to reactivate tumor-suppressor gene expression as a therapeutic strategy for cancer.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Jun</publication><modification>2021-02-19T21:55:23Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:21:11Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4993153</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27156192</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.bmc.2016.04.037</doi></cross_references></HashMap>