<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Cherkin D</submitter><funding>NIHR Research Professorship</funding><funding>NCCIH NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute</funding><pagination>361</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC4995645</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite numerous options for treating back pain and the increasing healthcare resources devoted to this problem, the prevalence and impact of back pain-related disability has not improved. It is now recognized that psychosocial factors, as well as physical factors, are important predictors of poor outcomes for back pain. A promising new approach that matches treatments to the physical and psychosocial obstacles to recovery, the STarT Back risk stratification approach, improved patients' physical function while reducing costs of care in the United Kingdom (UK). This trial evaluates implementation of this strategy in a United States (US) healthcare setting.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Six large primary care clinics in an integrated healthcare system in Washington State were block-rando</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</journal><pubmed_title>Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC4995645</pmcid><funding_grant_id>#R21AT0007326</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NF-SI-0515-10095</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Contract #398</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NIHR-RP-011-015</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 AT007326</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hsu C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piekara D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levine MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hill JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wellman R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cook A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rock P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Estlin KT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sowden G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jensen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cherkin D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balderson B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yeoman J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sherman K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hawkes R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foster NE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>LaPorte AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Evers SC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brewer G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite numerous options for treating back pain and the increasing healthcare resources devoted to this problem, the prevalence and impact of back pain-related disability has not improved. It is now recognized that psychosocial factors, as well as physical factors, are important predictors of poor outcomes for back pain. A promising new approach that matches treatments to the physical and psychosocial obstacles to recovery, the STarT Back risk stratification approach, improved patients' physical function while reducing costs of care in the United Kingdom (UK). This trial evaluates implementation of this strategy in a United States (US) healthcare setting.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Six large primary care clinics in an integrated healthcare system in Washington State were block-rando</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Aug</publication><modification>2026-07-15T23:31:41.614Z</modification><creation>2026-07-09T10:21:40.882Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC4995645</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27553626</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12891-016-1219-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>