{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Mark DB"],"funding":["NHLBI NIH HHS"],"pagination":["94-102"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5046832"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["165(2)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) found that initial use of at least 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) versus functional diagnostic testing strategies did not improve clinical outcomes in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring noninvasive testing.<h4>Objective</h4>To conduct an economic analysis for PROMISE (a major secondary aim of the study).<h4>Design</h4>Prospective economic study from the U.S. perspective. Comparisons were made according to the intention-to-treat principle, and CIs were calculated using bootstrap methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01174550).<h4>Setting</h4>190 U.S. centers.<h4>Patients</h4>9649 U.S. patients enrolled in PROMISE between July 2010 and September 2013. Median follow-up was 25 months.<h4>Measurements</h4>Technical costs of the initial (outpatient) testing strategy were estimated from Premier Research Database data. Hospital-based costs were estimated using hospital bills and Medicare cost-charge ratios. Physician fees were taken from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Costs were expressed in 2014 U.S. dollars, discounted at 3% annually, and estimated out to 3 years using inverse probability weighting methods.<h4>Results</h4>The mean initial testing costs were $174 for exercise electrocardiography; $404 for CTA; $501 to $514 for pharmacologic and exercise stress echocardiography, respectively; and $946 to $1132 for exercise and pharmacologic stress nuclear testing, respectively. Mean costs at 90 days were $2494 for the CTA strategy versus $2240 for the functional strategy (mean difference, $254 [95% CI, -$634 to $906]). The difference was associated with more revascularizations and catheterizations (4.25 per 100 patients) with CTA use. After 90 days, the mean cost difference between the groups out to 3 years remained small.<h4>Limitation</h4>Cost weights for test strategies were obtained from sources outside PROMISE.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Computed tomography angiography and functional diagnostic testing strategies in patients with suspected CAD have similar costs through 3 years of follow-up.<h4>Primary funding source</h4>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute."],"journal":["Annals of internal medicine"],"pubmed_title":["Economic Outcomes With Anatomical Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease."],"pmcid":["PMC5046832"],"funding_grant_id":["R01 HL098237","R01 HL098305","R01 HL098236","R01 HL098235"],"pubmed_authors":["Hoffmann U","Anstrom KJ","Knight JD","Mark DB","Cowper PA","Cooper LS","Daniels MR","PROMISE Investigators","Douglas PS","Patel MR","Lee KL","Federspiel JJ","Davidson-Ray L"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Economic Outcomes With Anatomical Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) found that initial use of at least 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) versus functional diagnostic testing strategies did not improve clinical outcomes in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring noninvasive testing.<h4>Objective</h4>To conduct an economic analysis for PROMISE (a major secondary aim of the study).<h4>Design</h4>Prospective economic study from the U.S. perspective. Comparisons were made according to the intention-to-treat principle, and CIs were calculated using bootstrap methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01174550).<h4>Setting</h4>190 U.S. centers.<h4>Patients</h4>9649 U.S. patients enrolled in PROMISE between July 2010 and September 2013. Median follow-up was 25 months.<h4>Measurements</h4>Technical costs of the initial (outpatient) testing strategy were estimated from Premier Research Database data. Hospital-based costs were estimated using hospital bills and Medicare cost-charge ratios. Physician fees were taken from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Costs were expressed in 2014 U.S. dollars, discounted at 3% annually, and estimated out to 3 years using inverse probability weighting methods.<h4>Results</h4>The mean initial testing costs were $174 for exercise electrocardiography; $404 for CTA; $501 to $514 for pharmacologic and exercise stress echocardiography, respectively; and $946 to $1132 for exercise and pharmacologic stress nuclear testing, respectively. Mean costs at 90 days were $2494 for the CTA strategy versus $2240 for the functional strategy (mean difference, $254 [95% CI, -$634 to $906]). The difference was associated with more revascularizations and catheterizations (4.25 per 100 patients) with CTA use. After 90 days, the mean cost difference between the groups out to 3 years remained small.<h4>Limitation</h4>Cost weights for test strategies were obtained from sources outside PROMISE.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Computed tomography angiography and functional diagnostic testing strategies in patients with suspected CAD have similar costs through 3 years of follow-up.<h4>Primary funding source</h4>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.","dates":{"release":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2016 Jul","modification":"2026-04-30T18:24:10.552Z","creation":"2019-03-27T02:25:41Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC5046832","cross_references":{"pubmed":["27214597"],"doi":["10.7326/m15-2639","10.7326/M15-2639"]}}