<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhang J</submitter><funding>Elucidating Loci Involved in Prostate Cancer Susceptibility</funding><funding>Mechanism of Ethnic/Racial Differences in Lung Cancer due to Cigarette Smoking</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>New Methods for Genomic Studies in African American Women</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>African American Prostate Cancer GWAS study</funding><funding>Genomics and Epidemiology</funding><funding>Population Architecture</funding><pagination>502-15</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5079159</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>38(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Association analysis using admixed populations imposes challenges and opportunities for disease mapping. By developing some explicit results for the variance of an allele of interest conditional on either local or global ancestry and by simulation of recently admixed genomes we evaluate power and false-positive rates under a variety of scenarios concerning linkage disequilibrium (LD) and the presence of unmeasured variants. Pairwise LD patterns were compared between admixed and nonadmixed populations using the HapMap phase 3 data. Based on the above, we showed that as follows: For causal variants with similar effect size in all populations, power is generally higher in a study using admixed population than using nonadmixed population, especially for highly differentiated SNPs. This gain of</pubmed_abstract><journal>Genetic epidemiology</journal><pubmed_title>The role of local ancestry adjustment in association studies using admixed populations.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5079159</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P01CA138338</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 HG004802</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>5R01CA165862-02</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 CA138338</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>5U01HG004802-04</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>5U19CA148537-04</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U19 CA148537</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>15UB-8402</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA165862</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 HG007397</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1U01HG007397-01</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zhang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stram DO</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The role of local ancestry adjustment in association studies using admixed populations.</name><description>Association analysis using admixed populations imposes challenges and opportunities for disease mapping. By developing some explicit results for the variance of an allele of interest conditional on either local or global ancestry and by simulation of recently admixed genomes we evaluate power and false-positive rates under a variety of scenarios concerning linkage disequilibrium (LD) and the presence of unmeasured variants. Pairwise LD patterns were compared between admixed and nonadmixed populations using the HapMap phase 3 data. Based on the above, we showed that as follows: For causal variants with similar effect size in all populations, power is generally higher in a study using admixed population than using nonadmixed population, especially for highly differentiated SNPs. This gain of</description><dates><release>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2014 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-27T01:23:16.015Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:27:28Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5079159</accession><cross_references><pubmed>25043967</pubmed><doi>10.1002/gepi.21835</doi></cross_references></HashMap>