<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Severn and Peninsula Audit and Research Collaborative for Surgeons (SPARCS) and West Midlands Research Collaborative (WMRC) on behalf of the Bluebelle Study Group</submitter><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><pagination>1738-1744</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5091629</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>103(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Designing RCTs in surgery requires consideration of existing evidence, stakeholders' views and emerging interventions, to ensure that research questions are relevant to patients, surgeons and the health service. When there is uncertainty about RCT design, feasibility work is recommended. This study aimed to assess how feasibility work could inform the design of a future pilot study and RCT (Bluebelle, HTA - 12/200/04).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a prospective survey of dressings used to cover abdominal wounds. Surgical trainees from 25 hospitals were invited to participate. Information on patient risk factors, operation type and type of wound dressings used was recorded for elective and unplanned abdominal procedures over a 2-week interval. The types of dressing used were s</pubmed_abstract><journal>The British journal of surgery</journal><pubmed_title>Feasibility work to inform the design of a randomized clinical trial of wound dressings in elective and unplanned abdominal surgery.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5091629</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NF-SI-0514-10114</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>12/200/04</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CL-2014-25-002</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/L004933/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/K025643/1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Townsend D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Court E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blazeby JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharples A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Papworth E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kynaston J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rogers CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Strong S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fallaize R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Atherton G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nicholson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barber Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Talbot H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharma E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ring N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coast J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reeves BC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blencowe NS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frank L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marriott P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hotton E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neito T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ekere C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mathers J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Banks J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Longman R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andronis L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buchan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Newman P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ellis L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sellars H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cutting J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eriksson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Calvert M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Donovan J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Young T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pinkney TD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bailey J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hodkinson T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hardy T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Nelson H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Macefield R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rooshenas L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Monteiro de Barros J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bamford R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mason J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milne T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Upchurch E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Youssef H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reza L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rowlands C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siassakos D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Noble E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shariff U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ives C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torrance A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bird J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McMullan C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Florance C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woodward M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Draycott T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tafazal H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zafar Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orchard P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clayton G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ide KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blencowe N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bennett J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gooberman-Hill R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grant C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Winter C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popplewell M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thompson N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Severn and Peninsula Audit and Research Collaborative for Surgeons (SPARCS) and West Midlands Research Collaborative (WMRC) on behalf of the Bluebelle Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magill L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chapman T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenwood A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhangu A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Summerour V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anderson E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Feasibility work to inform the design of a randomized clinical trial of wound dressings in elective and unplanned abdominal surgery.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Designing RCTs in surgery requires consideration of existing evidence, stakeholders' views and emerging interventions, to ensure that research questions are relevant to patients, surgeons and the health service. When there is uncertainty about RCT design, feasibility work is recommended. This study aimed to assess how feasibility work could inform the design of a future pilot study and RCT (Bluebelle, HTA - 12/200/04).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a prospective survey of dressings used to cover abdominal wounds. Surgical trainees from 25 hospitals were invited to participate. Information on patient risk factors, operation type and type of wound dressings used was recorded for elective and unplanned abdominal procedures over a 2-week interval. The types of dressing used were s</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-03T22:39:23.486Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:28:03Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5091629</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27488730</pubmed><doi>10.1002/bjs.10274</doi></cross_references></HashMap>