<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rudolph H</submitter><funding>Swiss National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>2187-203</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5113696</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>46(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Although CD8(+) T cells have been implied in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), the molecular mechanisms mediating CD8(+) T-cell migration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) into the central nervous system (CNS) are ill defined. Using in vitro live cell imaging, we directly compared the multistep extravasation of activated CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells across primary mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (pMBMECs) as a model for the BBB under physiological flow. Significantly higher numbers of CD8(+) than CD4(+) T cells arrested on pMBMECs under noninflammatory and inflammatory conditions. While CD4(+) T cells polarized and crawled prior to their diapedesis, the majority of CD8(+) T cells stalled and readily crossed the pMBMEC monolayer preferentially via a transcellular route. T-cell arrest and crawling were independent of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Rather, absence of endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 abolished increased arrest of CD8(+) over CD4(+) T cells and abrogated T-cell crawling, leading to the efficient reduction of CD4(+) , but to a lesser degree of CD8(+) , T-cell diapedesis across ICAM-1(null) /ICAM-2(-/-) pMBMECs. Thus, cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating the multistep extravasation of activated CD8(+) T cells across the BBB are distinguishable from those involved for CD4(+) T cells.</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of immunology</journal><pubmed_title>Postarrest stalling rather than crawling favors CD8(+) over CD4(+) T-cell migration across the blood-brain barrier under flow in vitro.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5113696</pmcid><funding_grant_id>149420</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>31003A_149420</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Klopstein A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Engelhardt B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blatti C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rudolph H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gruber I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyck R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Postarrest stalling rather than crawling favors CD8(+) over CD4(+) T-cell migration across the blood-brain barrier under flow in vitro.</name><description>Although CD8(+) T cells have been implied in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), the molecular mechanisms mediating CD8(+) T-cell migration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) into the central nervous system (CNS) are ill defined. Using in vitro live cell imaging, we directly compared the multistep extravasation of activated CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells across primary mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (pMBMECs) as a model for the BBB under physiological flow. Significantly higher numbers of CD8(+) than CD4(+) T cells arrested on pMBMECs under noninflammatory and inflammatory conditions. While CD4(+) T cells polarized and crawled prior to their diapedesis, the majority of CD8(+) T cells stalled and readily crossed the pMBMEC monolayer preferentially via a transcellular route. T-cell arrest and crawling were independent of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Rather, absence of endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2 abolished increased arrest of CD8(+) over CD4(+) T cells and abrogated T-cell crawling, leading to the efficient reduction of CD4(+) , but to a lesser degree of CD8(+) , T-cell diapedesis across ICAM-1(null) /ICAM-2(-/-) pMBMECs. Thus, cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating the multistep extravasation of activated CD8(+) T cells across the BBB are distinguishable from those involved for CD4(+) T cells.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-05T08:41:41.327Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:29:14Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5113696</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27338806</pubmed><doi>10.1002/eji.201546251</doi></cross_references></HashMap>