{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["6"],"submitter":["Wang SZ"],"pubmed_abstract":["We conducted a meta-analysis of analytic and observational studies to evaluate the association between smoking and epiretinal membrane (ERM). The pertinent studies were identified via a literature search using three databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase) and the reference lists of retrieved studies. Cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies meeting the predefined criteria were included. We extracted the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from each study. Overall risk estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses based on several stratified factors were also performed. Two cohort studies and six cross-sectional studies involving 46,837 subjects were included. The pooled effect of all eight studies showed an unexpected significant decrease"],"journal":["Scientific reports"],"pagination":["38038"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5126679"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["The Association between Smoking and Epiretinal Membrane."],"pmcid":["PMC5126679"],"pubmed_authors":["Tong QH","Wang SZ","Lu QK","Xu YF","Wang HY"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"The Association between Smoking and Epiretinal Membrane.","description":"We conducted a meta-analysis of analytic and observational studies to evaluate the association between smoking and epiretinal membrane (ERM). The pertinent studies were identified via a literature search using three databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase) and the reference lists of retrieved studies. Cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies meeting the predefined criteria were included. We extracted the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from each study. Overall risk estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses based on several stratified factors were also performed. Two cohort studies and six cross-sectional studies involving 46,837 subjects were included. The pooled effect of all eight studies showed an unexpected significant decrease","dates":{"release":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2016 Nov","modification":"2025-06-01T12:15:37.653Z","creation":"2019-03-27T02:30:03Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC5126679","cross_references":{"pubmed":["27897264"],"doi":["10.1038/srep38038"]}}