<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>113(47)</volume><submitter>Orlitsky A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Estimating the number of unseen species is an important problem in many scientific endeavors. Its most popular formulation, introduced by Fisher et al. [Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) J Animal Ecol 12(1):42-58], uses n samples to predict the number U of hitherto unseen species that would be observed if [Formula: see text] new samples were collected. Of considerable interest is the largest ratio t between the number of new and existing samples for which U can be accurately predicted. In seminal works, Good and Toulmin [Good I, Toulmin G (1956) Biometrika 43(102):45-63] constructed an intriguing estimator that predicts U for all [Formula: see text] Subsequently, Efron and Thisted [Efron B, Thisted R (1976) Biometrika 63(3):435-447] proposed a modification that empirically predicts </pubmed_abstract><journal>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</journal><pagination>13283-13288</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5127330</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Optimal prediction of the number of unseen species.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5127330</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Suresh AT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orlitsky A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Optimal prediction of the number of unseen species.</name><description>Estimating the number of unseen species is an important problem in many scientific endeavors. Its most popular formulation, introduced by Fisher et al. [Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) J Animal Ecol 12(1):42-58], uses n samples to predict the number U of hitherto unseen species that would be observed if [Formula: see text] new samples were collected. Of considerable interest is the largest ratio t between the number of new and existing samples for which U can be accurately predicted. In seminal works, Good and Toulmin [Good I, Toulmin G (1956) Biometrika 43(102):45-63] constructed an intriguing estimator that predicts U for all [Formula: see text] Subsequently, Efron and Thisted [Efron B, Thisted R (1976) Biometrika 63(3):435-447] proposed a modification that empirically predicts </description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Nov</publication><modification>2026-05-05T11:54:33.092Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:30:05Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5127330</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27830649</pubmed><doi>10.1073/pnas.1607774113</doi></cross_references></HashMap>