<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2(2)</volume><submitter>Vehus T</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>We compared four commonly used, commercially available reverse phase nanoLC columns for identification/determination of Wnt/β-catenin-related pathway proteins.&lt;h4>Materials &amp; methods&lt;/h4>The columns were: Chromolith&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> (silica monolith; Merke Millipore, MA, USA), PepMap™ (porous particles; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), Accucore™ (solid core particles; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and PepSwift™ (organic monolith; Thermo Fisher Scientific).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The peak capacity of the columns varied from 100 (Pepswift) to 190 (Accucore) (for 30 min gradients). All columns enabled identification/detection of GSK3β and β-catenin in the complex samples. However, even the columns with higher peak capacities could not enable detection of the somewhat less abundant proteins AXIN</pubmed_abstract><journal>Future science OA</journal><pagination>FSO119</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5137844</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of commercial nanoliquid chromatography columns for fast, targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5137844</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Krauss S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seterdal KE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lundanes E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vehus T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wilson SR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of commercial nanoliquid chromatography columns for fast, targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>We compared four commonly used, commercially available reverse phase nanoLC columns for identification/determination of Wnt/β-catenin-related pathway proteins.&lt;h4>Materials &amp; methods&lt;/h4>The columns were: Chromolith&lt;sup>®&lt;/sup> (silica monolith; Merke Millipore, MA, USA), PepMap™ (porous particles; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), Accucore™ (solid core particles; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and PepSwift™ (organic monolith; Thermo Fisher Scientific).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The peak capacity of the columns varied from 100 (Pepswift) to 190 (Accucore) (for 30 min gradients). All columns enabled identification/detection of GSK3β and β-catenin in the complex samples. However, even the columns with higher peak capacities could not enable detection of the somewhat less abundant proteins AXIN</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-26T02:00:35.835Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:30:49Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5137844</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28031966</pubmed><doi>10.4155/fsoa-2016-0014</doi></cross_references></HashMap>