<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2016</volume><submitter>Pizzuti A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>A 59-year-old man underwent an echocardiography study after myocardial infarction and it showed a thin, mobile mass attached to the aortic valve. A diagnosis of Lambl's excrescence (LE) was suspected. Coronary occlusion as a consequence of embolism of LE's material could not be excluded and the patient underwent surgical excision. Histology confirmed the diagnosis; however a differential diagnosis with papillary fibroelastoma could not be established because both of these structures are histologically indistinguishable. A brief survey of the literature is presented. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment have not been established yet.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Case reports in cardiology</journal><pagination>8370212</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5138484</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Two-Vessel Occlusion and a Large Lambl's Excrescence.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5138484</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Parisi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mosso L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tomasello A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pizzuti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cali' Quaglia F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient with Two-Vessel Occlusion and a Large Lambl's Excrescence.</name><description>A 59-year-old man underwent an echocardiography study after myocardial infarction and it showed a thin, mobile mass attached to the aortic valve. A diagnosis of Lambl's excrescence (LE) was suspected. Coronary occlusion as a consequence of embolism of LE's material could not be excluded and the patient underwent surgical excision. Histology confirmed the diagnosis; however a differential diagnosis with papillary fibroelastoma could not be established because both of these structures are histologically indistinguishable. A brief survey of the literature is presented. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment have not been established yet.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016</publication><modification>2025-04-26T02:00:44.828Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:30:51Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5138484</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27994887</pubmed><doi>10.1155/2016/8370212</doi></cross_references></HashMap>