<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(6)</volume><submitter>Lefort M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In France, there are important regional disparities of access to the renal transplant waiting list and transplantation. Our objectives were to compare the characteristics of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) of two French regions (Ile-de-France and Bretagne) and to identify determinants of access to the waiting list and subsequent transplantation, with a focus on temporary inactive status (TIS) periods.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>All 18-80-year-old incident patients who started dialysis in Ile-de-France or Bretagne between 2006 and 2009 were included (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 6160). Associations between patients' characteristics and placement on the waiting list or transplantation were assessed using a Fine and Gray model to take into account the competing risk of death and living donor transplantation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>At the end of the follow-up (31 December 2013), more patients had undergone transplantation in Bretagne than in Ile-de-France (30 versus 27%), although the percentage of waitlisted patients was higher in Ile-de-France than in Bretagne (47 versus 33%). More patients were on TIS and with a longer median TIS duration in Ile-de-France. Independent of age and clinical characteristics, patients in Bretagne were less likely to be waitlisted than those in Ile-de-France [subdistribution hazard ratio 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9)]. After waitlisting, patients in Bretagne were four times more likely to be transplanted.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our study highlights clinical practice differences in Bretagne and Ile-de-France and shows that facilitating access to the waiting list is not sufficient to improve access to renal transplantation, which also depends on organ availability.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical kidney journal</journal><pagination>849-857</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5162409</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Facilitating access to the renal transplant waiting list does not increase the number of transplantations: comparative study of two French regions.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5162409</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Le Meur N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bayat S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jais JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daugas E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laurent A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vigneau C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lefort M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lebbah S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Facilitating access to the renal transplant waiting list does not increase the number of transplantations: comparative study of two French regions.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In France, there are important regional disparities of access to the renal transplant waiting list and transplantation. Our objectives were to compare the characteristics of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) of two French regions (Ile-de-France and Bretagne) and to identify determinants of access to the waiting list and subsequent transplantation, with a focus on temporary inactive status (TIS) periods.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>All 18-80-year-old incident patients who started dialysis in Ile-de-France or Bretagne between 2006 and 2009 were included (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 6160). Associations between patients' characteristics and placement on the waiting list or transplantation were assessed using a Fine and Gray model to take into account the competing risk of death and living donor transplantation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>At the end of the follow-up (31 December 2013), more patients had undergone transplantation in Bretagne than in Ile-de-France (30 versus 27%), although the percentage of waitlisted patients was higher in Ile-de-France than in Bretagne (47 versus 33%). More patients were on TIS and with a longer median TIS duration in Ile-de-France. Independent of age and clinical characteristics, patients in Bretagne were less likely to be waitlisted than those in Ile-de-France [subdistribution hazard ratio 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.7-0.9)]. After waitlisting, patients in Bretagne were four times more likely to be transplanted.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our study highlights clinical practice differences in Bretagne and Ile-de-France and shows that facilitating access to the waiting list is not sufficient to improve access to renal transplantation, which also depends on organ availability.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Dec</publication><modification>2024-12-04T01:06:12.194Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:31:46Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5162409</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27994866</pubmed><doi>10.1093/ckj/sfw078</doi></cross_references></HashMap>