biostudies-literatureUnknown95(49)Wang L<h4>Background</h4>Aberrant hepatic arteries (HAs) encountered during pancreatoduodenectomy are difficult to manage.<h4>Mehtods</h4>Two cases with rare types of aberrant HA running through the pancreatic parenchyma were reviewed.<h4>Results</h4>The first case, a 68-year-old man, was admitted with obstructive jaundice. A tumor of the pancreatic head and aberrant HAs were suspected on computed tomography (CT) scan. At laparotomy, a new variation was identified; namely, 2 aberrant arteries-a right replaced HA and middle HA (RMHA) that both originated from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and ran via intrapancreatic paths posterior and anterior to the pancreatic head, respectively. Branches of the RMHA to the pancreas were ligated and severed and the trunk preserved. The RMHA was mistakenlMedicinee3867https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5265976biostudies-literatureAberrant hepatic arteries running through pancreatic parenchyma encountered during pancreatoduodenectomy: Two rare case reports and strategies for surgical treatment.PMC5265976Zhang ZSun DXu JWang LfalseAberrant hepatic arteries running through pancreatic parenchyma encountered during pancreatoduodenectomy: Two rare case reports and strategies for surgical treatment.<h4>Background</h4>Aberrant hepatic arteries (HAs) encountered during pancreatoduodenectomy are difficult to manage.<h4>Mehtods</h4>Two cases with rare types of aberrant HA running through the pancreatic parenchyma were reviewed.<h4>Results</h4>The first case, a 68-year-old man, was admitted with obstructive jaundice. A tumor of the pancreatic head and aberrant HAs were suspected on computed tomography (CT) scan. At laparotomy, a new variation was identified; namely, 2 aberrant arteries-a right replaced HA and middle HA (RMHA) that both originated from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and ran via intrapancreatic paths posterior and anterior to the pancreatic head, respectively. Branches of the RMHA to the pancreas were ligated and severed and the trunk preserved. The RMHA was mistakenl2016-01-01T00:00:00Z2016 Dec2025-05-18T13:47:35.232Z2025-05-18T13:47:35.232ZS-EPMC52659762793050410.1097/MD.0000000000003867