<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Houle B</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><pagination>112-132</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5300069</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>28(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Researchers are often skeptical of sexual behavior surveys: respondents may lie or forget details of their intimate lives, and interviewers may exercise authority in how they capture responses. We use data from a 2010-2011 cross-sectional sexual behavior survey in rural South Africa to explore who says what to whom about their sexual lives. Results show an effect of fieldworker age across outcomes -- respondents report "safer", more "responsible" sexual behavior to older fieldworkers; and an effect of fieldworker sex -- men report more sexual partners to female fieldworkers. Understanding fieldworker effects on the production of sexual behavior survey data serves methodological and analytical goals.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Field methods</journal><pubmed_title>Let's Talk about Sex, Maybe: Interviewers, Respondents, and Sexual Behavior Reporting in Rural South Africa.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5300069</pmcid><funding_grant_id>085477/Z/08/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P2C HD066613</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Menken J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Houle B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Angotti N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kabudula C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tollman SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez-Olive FX</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klipstein-Grobusch K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clark SJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Let's Talk about Sex, Maybe: Interviewers, Respondents, and Sexual Behavior Reporting in Rural South Africa.</name><description>Researchers are often skeptical of sexual behavior surveys: respondents may lie or forget details of their intimate lives, and interviewers may exercise authority in how they capture responses. We use data from a 2010-2011 cross-sectional sexual behavior survey in rural South Africa to explore who says what to whom about their sexual lives. Results show an effect of fieldworker age across outcomes -- respondents report "safer", more "responsible" sexual behavior to older fieldworkers; and an effect of fieldworker sex -- men report more sexual partners to female fieldworkers. Understanding fieldworker effects on the production of sexual behavior survey data serves methodological and analytical goals.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016</publication><modification>2020-10-29T14:02:28Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:36:11Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5300069</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28190977</pubmed><doi>10.1177/1525822X15595343</doi><doi>10.1177/1525822x15595343</doi></cross_references></HashMap>