<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Devanand DP</submitter><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><pagination>55-61</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5321859</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>31(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The utility of functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment is not established.In 3886 individuals with mild cognitive impairment evaluated and followed at 34 National Alzheimer Coordinating Center sites, informant-reported Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) items associated with progression to dementia were derived in a training set (n=1943) and tested in the validation set (n=1943).In the training set, the optimal combination comprised 6 FAQ items (FAQ6): difficulties with finances (2 items), remembering events/appointments, playing games of skill, current events, and travel. In the validation set, hazard ratio for dementia increased from 2.00 for 1 FAQ6 deficit to 5.56 for 6 FAQ6 deficits. In patients 50 to 67 years old with high Mini Mental State Exam scores, dementia risk rose from 12.06% for no FAQ6 deficits to 56.75% for 6 functional deficits. Likelihood of progression to dementia reached 80% to 89% in older age groups with low Mini Mental State Exam and severe FAQ6 deficits.Specific functional deficits increased dementia risk and, with age and global cognition, constituted a validated clinical algorithm to estimate dementia risk. Clinicians can use this clinically important algorithm to personalize decision-making about further investigation and identify high-risk patients for early treatment or inclusion in clinical trials.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders</journal><pubmed_title>Impact of Functional Deficits in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Clinical Algorithm to Predict Progression to Dementia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5321859</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 AG013846</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG028383</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG008017</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010133</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005146</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG033514</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005681</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005142</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG017761</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG041795</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG019610</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG023501</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG008051</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010129</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG013854</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 AG007232</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005138</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG008702</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010124</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005134</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG012300</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG025688</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AG016976</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005136</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG035982</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AG010161</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005131</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG005133</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG016574</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG016573</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 AG016570</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Devanand DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown PJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of Functional Deficits in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Clinical Algorithm to Predict Progression to Dementia.</name><description>The utility of functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment is not established.In 3886 individuals with mild cognitive impairment evaluated and followed at 34 National Alzheimer Coordinating Center sites, informant-reported Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) items associated with progression to dementia were derived in a training set (n=1943) and tested in the validation set (n=1943).In the training set, the optimal combination comprised 6 FAQ items (FAQ6): difficulties with finances (2 items), remembering events/appointments, playing games of skill, current events, and travel. In the validation set, hazard ratio for dementia increased from 2.00 for 1 FAQ6 deficit to 5.56 for 6 FAQ6 deficits. In patients 50 to 67 years old with high Mini Mental State Exam scores, dementia risk rose from 12.06% for no FAQ6 deficits to 56.75% for 6 functional deficits. Likelihood of progression to dementia reached 80% to 89% in older age groups with low Mini Mental State Exam and severe FAQ6 deficits.Specific functional deficits increased dementia risk and, with age and global cognition, constituted a validated clinical algorithm to estimate dementia risk. Clinicians can use this clinically important algorithm to personalize decision-making about further investigation and identify high-risk patients for early treatment or inclusion in clinical trials.</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Jan-Mar</publication><modification>2020-10-29T09:56:25Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:37:09Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5321859</accession><cross_references><pubmed>27819843</pubmed><doi>10.1097/WAD.0000000000000160</doi><doi>10.1097/wad.0000000000000160</doi></cross_references></HashMap>