<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Robledo-Abad C</submitter><funding>Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada</funding><funding>Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas</funding><funding>European Research Council</funding><funding>Austrian Academy of Sciences</funding><funding>Seventh Framework Programme</funding><funding>Stiftung Mercator Schweiz</funding><pagination>541-556</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5340281</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The possibility of using bioenergy as a climate change mitigation measure has sparked a discussion of whether and how bioenergy production contributes to sustainable development. We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature to illuminate this relationship and found a limited scientific basis for policymaking. Our results indicate that knowledge on the sustainable development impacts of bioenergy production is concentrated in a few well-studied countries, focuses on environmental and economic impacts, and mostly relates to dedicated agricultural biomass plantations. The scope and methodological approaches in studies differ widely and only a small share of the studies sufficiently reports on context and/or baseline conditions, which makes it difficult to get a general unders</pubmed_abstract><journal>Global change biology. Bioenergy</journal><pubmed_title>Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5340281</pmcid><funding_grant_id>313533</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>603542</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Olund M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Althaus HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muys B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nordborg M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hunsberger C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robledo-Abad C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leitner S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larsen RK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Geddes A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanger S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lilliestam J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popp A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Creutzig F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berndes G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reinhard J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gregg JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bolwig S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lotze-Campen H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Corbera E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harper RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haberl H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lauk C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Portugal-Pereira J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scheiffle L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Ulloa J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orlowsky B</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited.</name><description>The possibility of using bioenergy as a climate change mitigation measure has sparked a discussion of whether and how bioenergy production contributes to sustainable development. We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature to illuminate this relationship and found a limited scientific basis for policymaking. Our results indicate that knowledge on the sustainable development impacts of bioenergy production is concentrated in a few well-studied countries, focuses on environmental and economic impacts, and mostly relates to dedicated agricultural biomass plantations. The scope and methodological approaches in studies differ widely and only a small share of the studies sufficiently reports on context and/or baseline conditions, which makes it difficult to get a general unders</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Mar</publication><modification>2026-05-29T22:19:59.386Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T06:13:44.787Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5340281</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28331552</pubmed><doi>10.1111/gcbb.12338</doi></cross_references></HashMap>