<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Alexandratos VG</submitter><funding>Seventh Framework Programme</funding><pagination>2140-2150</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5343554</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>51(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The impact on U(VI) adsorbed to lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH) and hematite (α-Fe&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>O&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub>) was assessed when exposed to aqueous sulfide (S(-II)&lt;sub>aq&lt;/sub>) at pH 8.0. With both minerals, competition between S(-II) and U(VI) for surface sites caused instantaneous release of adsorbed U(VI). Compared to lepidocrocite, consumption of S(-II)&lt;sub>aq&lt;/sub> proceeded slower with hematite, but yielded maximum dissolved U concentrations that were more than 10 times higher, representing about one-third of the initially adsorbed U. Prolonged presence of S(-II)&lt;sub>aq&lt;/sub> in experiments with hematite in combination with a larger release of adsorbed U(VI), enhanced the reduction of U(VI): after 24 h of reaction about 60-70% of U was in the form of U(IV), much higher than the 25% detected i</pubmed_abstract><journal>Environmental science &amp; technology</journal><pubmed_title>Fate of Adsorbed U(VI) during Sulfidization of Lepidocrocite and Hematite.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5343554</pmcid><funding_grant_id>212287</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Alexandratos VG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Cappellen P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Behrends T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Fate of Adsorbed U(VI) during Sulfidization of Lepidocrocite and Hematite.</name><description>The impact on U(VI) adsorbed to lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH) and hematite (α-Fe&lt;sub>2&lt;/sub>O&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub>) was assessed when exposed to aqueous sulfide (S(-II)&lt;sub>aq&lt;/sub>) at pH 8.0. With both minerals, competition between S(-II) and U(VI) for surface sites caused instantaneous release of adsorbed U(VI). Compared to lepidocrocite, consumption of S(-II)&lt;sub>aq&lt;/sub> proceeded slower with hematite, but yielded maximum dissolved U concentrations that were more than 10 times higher, representing about one-third of the initially adsorbed U. Prolonged presence of S(-II)&lt;sub>aq&lt;/sub> in experiments with hematite in combination with a larger release of adsorbed U(VI), enhanced the reduction of U(VI): after 24 h of reaction about 60-70% of U was in the form of U(IV), much higher than the 25% detected i</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T14:32:52.806Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:38:16Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5343554</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28121137</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acs.est.6b05453</doi></cross_references></HashMap>