<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Clark RSB</submitter><funding>National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke</funding><funding>National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences</funding><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>e0180280</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5501440</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(7)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There are no therapies shown to improve outcome after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to verify brain exposure of the systemically administered antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and the synergistic adjuvant probenecid, and identify adverse effects of this drug combination after severe TBI in children.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>IRB-approved, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled Phase I study in children 2 to 18 years-of-age admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit after severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤8) requiring an externalized ventricular drain for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP). Patients were recruited from November 2011-August 2013. Fourteen patients (n = 7/group) were randomly assigned after obtaining informed consent to receive probenecid (25 mg/kg load, then 10 mg/kg/dose q6h×11 doses) and NAC (140 mg/kg load, then 70 mg/kg/dose q4h×17 doses), or placebos via naso/orogastric tube. Serum and CSF samples were drawn pre-bolus and 1-96 h after randomization and drug concentrations were measured via UPLC-MS/MS. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was assessed at 3 months.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There were no adverse events attributable to drug treatment. One patient in the placebo group was withdrawn due to adverse effects. In the treatment group, NAC concentrations ranged from 16,977.3±2,212.3 to 16,786.1±3,285.3 in serum and from 269.3±113.0 to 467.9±262.7 ng/mL in CSF, at 24 to 72 h post-bolus, respectively; and probenecid concentrations ranged from 75.4.3±10.0 to 52.9±25.8 in serum and 5.4±1.0 to 4.6±2.1 μg/mL in CSF, at 24 to 72 h post-bolus, respectively (mean±SEM). Temperature, mean arterial pressure, ICP, use of ICP-directed therapies, surveillance serum brain injury biomarkers, and GOS at 3 months were not different between groups.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Treatment resulted in detectable concentrations of NAC and probenecid in CSF and was not associated with undesirable effects after TBI in children.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01322009.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pubmed_title>Phase I randomized clinical trial of N-acetylcysteine in combination with an adjuvant probenecid for treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in children.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5501440</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 NS069247</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 HD040686</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR000146</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 NS081041</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Poloyac SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clark RSB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wisniewski SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bell MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Empey PE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosario BL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nolin TD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bayır H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kochanek PM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horvat CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Au AK</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Phase I randomized clinical trial of N-acetylcysteine in combination with an adjuvant probenecid for treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in children.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There are no therapies shown to improve outcome after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to verify brain exposure of the systemically administered antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and the synergistic adjuvant probenecid, and identify adverse effects of this drug combination after severe TBI in children.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>IRB-approved, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled Phase I study in children 2 to 18 years-of-age admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit after severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤8) requiring an externalized ventricular drain for measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP). Patients were recruited from November 2011-August 2013. Fourteen patients (n = 7/group) were randomly assigned after obtaining informed consent to receive probenecid (25 mg/kg load, then 10 mg/kg/dose q6h×11 doses) and NAC (140 mg/kg load, then 70 mg/kg/dose q4h×17 doses), or placebos via naso/orogastric tube. Serum and CSF samples were drawn pre-bolus and 1-96 h after randomization and drug concentrations were measured via UPLC-MS/MS. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was assessed at 3 months.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There were no adverse events attributable to drug treatment. One patient in the placebo group was withdrawn due to adverse effects. In the treatment group, NAC concentrations ranged from 16,977.3±2,212.3 to 16,786.1±3,285.3 in serum and from 269.3±113.0 to 467.9±262.7 ng/mL in CSF, at 24 to 72 h post-bolus, respectively; and probenecid concentrations ranged from 75.4.3±10.0 to 52.9±25.8 in serum and 5.4±1.0 to 4.6±2.1 μg/mL in CSF, at 24 to 72 h post-bolus, respectively (mean±SEM). Temperature, mean arterial pressure, ICP, use of ICP-directed therapies, surveillance serum brain injury biomarkers, and GOS at 3 months were not different between groups.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Treatment resulted in detectable concentrations of NAC and probenecid in CSF and was not associated with undesirable effects after TBI in children.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01322009.</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017</publication><modification>2024-12-03T16:27:03.669Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:49:46Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5501440</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28686657</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0180280</doi></cross_references></HashMap>