<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(1)</volume><submitter>Mould RC</submitter><funding>CIHR</funding><pubmed_abstract>For a vaccine to be effective it must induce a sufficiently robust and specific immune response. Multi-site injection protocols can increase the titers of rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies. Hypothetically, spreading a vaccine dose across multiple lymphatic drainage regions could also potentiate T cell responses. We used a replication-deficient adenovirus serotype 5-vectored cancer vaccine targeting the melanoma-associated antigen dopachrome tautomerase. Clinically, high numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells are a positive prognostic indicator. As such, there is interest in maximizing tumor-specific T cell responses. Our findings confirm a positive correlation between the number of tumor-specific T cells and survival. More importantly, we show for the first time that using multiple injection sites could increase the number of vaccine-induced CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells specific for a self-tumor antigen. Further, the number of tumor antigen-specific antibodies, as well CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells specific for a foreign antigen could also be enhanced. Our results show that multi-site vaccination induces higher magnitude immune responses than a single-bolus injection. This provides a very simple and almost cost-free strategy to potentially improve the efficacy of any current and future vaccine. Broader clinical adoption of multi-site vaccination protocols for the treatment of cancers and infectious diseases should be given serious consideration.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Scientific reports</journal><pagination>8322</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5559552</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Enhancing Immune Responses to Cancer Vaccines Using Multi-Site Injections.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5559552</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mould RC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karimi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wootton SK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petrik JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mutsaers AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Susta L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bridle BW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Vloten JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>AuYeung AWK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wood GA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Enhancing Immune Responses to Cancer Vaccines Using Multi-Site Injections.</name><description>For a vaccine to be effective it must induce a sufficiently robust and specific immune response. Multi-site injection protocols can increase the titers of rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies. Hypothetically, spreading a vaccine dose across multiple lymphatic drainage regions could also potentiate T cell responses. We used a replication-deficient adenovirus serotype 5-vectored cancer vaccine targeting the melanoma-associated antigen dopachrome tautomerase. Clinically, high numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells are a positive prognostic indicator. As such, there is interest in maximizing tumor-specific T cell responses. Our findings confirm a positive correlation between the number of tumor-specific T cells and survival. More importantly, we show for the first time that using multiple injection sites could increase the number of vaccine-induced CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells specific for a self-tumor antigen. Further, the number of tumor antigen-specific antibodies, as well CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells specific for a foreign antigen could also be enhanced. Our results show that multi-site vaccination induces higher magnitude immune responses than a single-bolus injection. This provides a very simple and almost cost-free strategy to potentially improve the efficacy of any current and future vaccine. Broader clinical adoption of multi-site vaccination protocols for the treatment of cancers and infectious diseases should be given serious consideration.</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Aug</publication><modification>2021-02-21T11:32:32Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:53:42Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5559552</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28814733</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41598-017-08665-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>