<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>41(4)</volume><submitter>Kim KJ</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Long-term durable glycemic control is a difficult goal in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the factors associated with durable glycemic control in a real clinical setting.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 194 new-onset, drug-naïve patients with T2DM who were diagnosed between January 2011 and March 2013, and were followed up for >2 years. Glycemic durability was defined as the maintenance of optimal glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] &lt;7.0%) for 2 years without substitution or adding other glucose-lowering agents. Clinical factors and glycemic markers associated with glycemic durability were compared between two groups: a durability group and a non-durability group.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Patients in the durability group had a higher baseline body mass index (26.1 kg/m² vs. 24.9 kg/m²) and lower HbA1c (8.6% vs. 9.7%) than the non-durability group. The initial choice of glucose-lowering agents was similar in both groups, except for insulin and sulfonylureas, which were more frequently prescribed in the non-durability group. In multiple logistic regression analyses, higher levels of education, physical activity, and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) were associated with glycemic durability. Notably, lower HbA1c (&lt;7.0%) at baseline and first follow-up were significantly associated with glycemic durability (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51 to 22.3) (adjusted OR, 9.27; 95% CI, 1.62 to 53.1, respectively), after adjusting for confounding variables including the types of glucose-lowering agents.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Early achievement of HbA1c level within the glycemic target was a determinant of long-term glycemic durability in new-onset T2DM, as were higher levels of education, physical activity, and HOMA-β.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diabetes &amp; metabolism journal</journal><pagination>284-295</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5583406</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Determinants of Long-Term Durable Glycemic Control in New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5583406</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kim SG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>An JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim HY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim NH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Determinants of Long-Term Durable Glycemic Control in New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Long-term durable glycemic control is a difficult goal in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the factors associated with durable glycemic control in a real clinical setting.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 194 new-onset, drug-naïve patients with T2DM who were diagnosed between January 2011 and March 2013, and were followed up for >2 years. Glycemic durability was defined as the maintenance of optimal glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] &lt;7.0%) for 2 years without substitution or adding other glucose-lowering agents. Clinical factors and glycemic markers associated with glycemic durability were compared between two groups: a durability group and a non-durability group.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Patients in the durability group had a higher baseline body mass index (26.1 kg/m² vs. 24.9 kg/m²) and lower HbA1c (8.6% vs. 9.7%) than the non-durability group. The initial choice of glucose-lowering agents was similar in both groups, except for insulin and sulfonylureas, which were more frequently prescribed in the non-durability group. In multiple logistic regression analyses, higher levels of education, physical activity, and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) were associated with glycemic durability. Notably, lower HbA1c (&lt;7.0%) at baseline and first follow-up were significantly associated with glycemic durability (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51 to 22.3) (adjusted OR, 9.27; 95% CI, 1.62 to 53.1, respectively), after adjusting for confounding variables including the types of glucose-lowering agents.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Early achievement of HbA1c level within the glycemic target was a determinant of long-term glycemic durability in new-onset T2DM, as were higher levels of education, physical activity, and HOMA-β.</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Aug</publication><modification>2024-11-20T18:49:45.89Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:55:22Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5583406</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28868826</pubmed><doi>10.4093/dmj.2017.41.4.284</doi></cross_references></HashMap>