<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Frey R</submitter><funding>Swiss National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>e1701381</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5627985</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>3(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>To what extent is there a general factor of risk preference, &lt;i>R&lt;/i>, akin to &lt;i>g&lt;/i>, the general factor of intelligence? Can risk preference be regarded as a stable psychological trait? These conceptual issues persist because few attempts have been made to integrate multiple risk-taking measures, particularly measures from different and largely unrelated measurement traditions (self-reported propensity measures assessing stated preferences, incentivized behavioral measures eliciting revealed preferences, and frequency measures assessing actual risky activities). Adopting a comprehensive psychometric approach (1507 healthy adults completing 39 risk-taking measures, with a subsample of 109 participants completing a retest session after 6 months), we provide a substantive empirical founda</pubmed_abstract><journal>Science advances</journal><pubmed_title>Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5627985</pmcid><funding_grant_id>136227</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>award319238</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CRSII1_136227</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Mata R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rieskamp J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hertwig R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pedroni A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frey R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits.</name><description>To what extent is there a general factor of risk preference, &lt;i>R&lt;/i>, akin to &lt;i>g&lt;/i>, the general factor of intelligence? Can risk preference be regarded as a stable psychological trait? These conceptual issues persist because few attempts have been made to integrate multiple risk-taking measures, particularly measures from different and largely unrelated measurement traditions (self-reported propensity measures assessing stated preferences, incentivized behavioral measures eliciting revealed preferences, and frequency measures assessing actual risky activities). Adopting a comprehensive psychometric approach (1507 healthy adults completing 39 risk-taking measures, with a subsample of 109 participants completing a retest session after 6 months), we provide a substantive empirical founda</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Oct</publication><modification>2026-07-15T15:12:57.81Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T02:58:12Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5627985</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28983511</pubmed><doi>10.1126/sciadv.1701381</doi></cross_references></HashMap>