{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["2(2)"],"submitter":["Kim S"],"funding":["Dementia Collaborative Research Centres, Australia","Dementia Collaborative Research Centres"],"pubmed_abstract":["INTRODUCTION:To assess the reliability of short versions of the Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI). METHODS:A short form of the ANU-ADRI (ANU-ADRI-SF) was developed by assessing risk and protective factors with single questions where possible and with short forms of sub-questionnaires where available. The tick box form of the ANU-ADRI (ANU-ADRI-TB) was developed with unique questions for each risk and protective factor for Alzheimer's disease. The short versions were evaluated in an independent community sample of 504 participants with a mean age of 45.01 (SD = 14.85, range = 18-81). RESULTS:The short versions demonstrated high reliabilities when compared with the ANU-ADRI. However, the proportion of misclassification was high for some risk factors and"],"journal":["Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)"],"pagination":["93-98"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5644274"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Assessing reliability of short and tick box forms of the ANU-ADRI: Convenient alternatives of a self-report Alzheimer's disease risk assessment."],"pmcid":["PMC5644274"],"pubmed_authors":["Kim S","Cherbuin N","Anstey KJ"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Assessing reliability of short and tick box forms of the ANU-ADRI: Convenient alternatives of a self-report Alzheimer's disease risk assessment.","description":"INTRODUCTION:To assess the reliability of short versions of the Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI). METHODS:A short form of the ANU-ADRI (ANU-ADRI-SF) was developed by assessing risk and protective factors with single questions where possible and with short forms of sub-questionnaires where available. The tick box form of the ANU-ADRI (ANU-ADRI-TB) was developed with unique questions for each risk and protective factor for Alzheimer's disease. The short versions were evaluated in an independent community sample of 504 participants with a mean age of 45.01 (SD = 14.85, range = 18-81). RESULTS:The short versions demonstrated high reliabilities when compared with the ANU-ADRI. However, the proportion of misclassification was high for some risk factors and","dates":{"release":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2016 Jun","modification":"2025-06-01T02:36:47Z","creation":"2025-06-01T02:36:47Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC5644274","cross_references":{"pubmed":["29067296"],"doi":["10.1016/j.trci.2016.03.001"]}}