<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(1)</volume><submitter>Salvatore S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>This paper reports the framework, method and main findings of an analysis of cultural milieus in 4 European countries (Estonia, Greece, Italy, and UK). The analysis is based on a questionnaire applied to a sample built through a two-step procedure of post-hoc random selection from a broader dataset based on an online survey. Responses to the questionnaire were subjected to multidimensional analysis-a combination of Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Cluster Analysis. We identified 5 symbolic universes, that correspond to basic, embodied, affect-laden, generalized worldviews. People in this study see the world as either a) an ordered universe; b) a matter of interpersonal bond; c) a caring society; d) consisting of a niche of belongingness; e) a hostile place (others' world). These symbolic universes were also interpreted as semiotic capital: they reflect the capacity of a place to foster social and civic development. Moreover, the distribution of the symbolic universes, and therefore social and civic engagement, is demonstrated to be variable across the 4 countries in the analysis. Finally, we develop a retrospective reconstruction of the distribution of symbolic universes as well as the interplay between their current state and past, present and future socio-institutional scenarios.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e0189885</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5752019</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies' cultural milieu.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5752019</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Sammut G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krasteva A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mossi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cremaschi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meschiari C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kadianaki I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Avdi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salvatore S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kharlamov NA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Redd R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santarpia A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsopoulos A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veltri GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Battaglia F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Re.Cri.Re. Consortium</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mannarini T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kullasepp K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Psinas P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fini V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castro-Tejerina J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciavolino E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valmorbida A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rochira A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valsiner J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies' cultural milieu.</name><description>This paper reports the framework, method and main findings of an analysis of cultural milieus in 4 European countries (Estonia, Greece, Italy, and UK). The analysis is based on a questionnaire applied to a sample built through a two-step procedure of post-hoc random selection from a broader dataset based on an online survey. Responses to the questionnaire were subjected to multidimensional analysis-a combination of Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Cluster Analysis. We identified 5 symbolic universes, that correspond to basic, embodied, affect-laden, generalized worldviews. People in this study see the world as either a) an ordered universe; b) a matter of interpersonal bond; c) a caring society; d) consisting of a niche of belongingness; e) a hostile place (others' world). These symbolic universes were also interpreted as semiotic capital: they reflect the capacity of a place to foster social and civic development. Moreover, the distribution of the symbolic universes, and therefore social and civic engagement, is demonstrated to be variable across the 4 countries in the analysis. Finally, we develop a retrospective reconstruction of the distribution of symbolic universes as well as the interplay between their current state and past, present and future socio-institutional scenarios.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018</publication><modification>2021-02-20T10:29:42Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T03:06:13Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5752019</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29298349</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189885</doi></cross_references></HashMap>