{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Dall PM"],"funding":["Medical Research Council"],"pagination":["e013844"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5775464"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["7(4)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>Sedentary behaviour (SB) has distinct deleterious health outcomes, yet there is no consensus on best practice for measurement. This study aimed to identify the optimal self-report tool for population surveillance of SB, using a systematic framework.<h4>Design</h4>A framework, TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST), consisting of four domains (type of assessment, recall period, temporal unit and assessment period), was developed based on a systematic inventory of existing tools. The inventory was achieved through a systematic review of studies reporting SB and tracing back to the original description. A systematic review of the accuracy and sensitivity to change of these tools was then mapped against TASST domains.<h4>Data sources</h4>Systematic search"],"journal":["BMJ open"],"pubmed_title":["TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST) framework for development, comparison and evaluation of self-report tools: content analysis and systematic review."],"pmcid":["PMC5775464"],"funding_grant_id":["MR/K025023/1","MR/K00414X/1","Seniors USP: Understanding Sedentary Patterns MR/K"],"pubmed_authors":["Coulter EH","Fitzsimons CF","Chastin S","Starr J","Laird K","Mutrie N","Sattar N","Gill J","Shaw R","Greig C","Deary I","Hindle E","Wyke S","Mead G","Palmer V","Cukic I","Granat M","Radakovic R","Gale C","Stewart S","Skelton DA","Seniors USP Team","Dall PM","Dontje M","Der G","Gray C","Cox S"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST) framework for development, comparison and evaluation of self-report tools: content analysis and systematic review.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>Sedentary behaviour (SB) has distinct deleterious health outcomes, yet there is no consensus on best practice for measurement. This study aimed to identify the optimal self-report tool for population surveillance of SB, using a systematic framework.<h4>Design</h4>A framework, TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST), consisting of four domains (type of assessment, recall period, temporal unit and assessment period), was developed based on a systematic inventory of existing tools. The inventory was achieved through a systematic review of studies reporting SB and tracing back to the original description. A systematic review of the accuracy and sensitivity to change of these tools was then mapped against TASST domains.<h4>Data sources</h4>Systematic search","dates":{"release":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2017 Apr","modification":"2025-04-04T10:04:13.85Z","creation":"2019-03-26T22:46:39Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC5775464","cross_references":{"pubmed":["28391233"],"doi":["10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013844"]}}