<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2018</volume><submitter>Mihaltz K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The purpose of this prospective, randomised study was to interocularly compare the visual performance after implantation of two different toric IOLs with different haptic design.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>59 subjects with corneal astigmatism greater than 1.25 diopter (D) were implanted with an AT TORBI 709M IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) in one eye and with a Tecnis toric aspheric IOL (Abbot Medical Optics) in the other eye. Observation procedure was performed 12 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction, IOL rotation, and IOL position.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Mean UCDVA was 0.04 ± 0.14 logMAR for AT TORBI eyes and 0.06 ± 0.15 logMAR for Tecnis eyes (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.3). The postoperative spherical equivalent values were s</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of ophthalmology</journal><pagination>4064369</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5828049</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of Two Toric IOLs with Different Haptic Design: Optical Quality after 1 Year.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5828049</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Lasta M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weingessel B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vecsei-Marlovits PV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mihaltz K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burgmuller M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of Two Toric IOLs with Different Haptic Design: Optical Quality after 1 Year.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The purpose of this prospective, randomised study was to interocularly compare the visual performance after implantation of two different toric IOLs with different haptic design.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>59 subjects with corneal astigmatism greater than 1.25 diopter (D) were implanted with an AT TORBI 709M IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) in one eye and with a Tecnis toric aspheric IOL (Abbot Medical Optics) in the other eye. Observation procedure was performed 12 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction, IOL rotation, and IOL position.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Mean UCDVA was 0.04 ± 0.14 logMAR for AT TORBI eyes and 0.06 ± 0.15 logMAR for Tecnis eyes (&lt;i>p&lt;/i> = 0.3). The postoperative spherical equivalent values were s</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018</publication><modification>2025-04-19T18:25:25.836Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:23:29Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5828049</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29607216</pubmed><doi>10.1155/2018/4064369</doi></cross_references></HashMap>