<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(3)</volume><submitter>Miyata H</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To assess the use of laparoscopic surgeries (LS) and the association between its performance and hospitals' preference for LS over open surgeries.&lt;h4>Summary background data&lt;/h4>LS is increasingly used in many abdominal surgeries, albeit both with and without solid guideline recommendations. To date, the hospitals' preference (LS vs. open surgeries) and its association with in-hospital outcomes has not been evaluated.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We enrolled patients undergoing 8 types of gastrointestinal surgeries in 2011-2013 in the Japanese National Clinical Database. We assessed the use of LS and the occurrences of surgery-related morbidity and mortality during the study period. Further, for 4 typical LS procedures, we assessed the hospitals' preference for LS by modeling the propensity to perform LS (over open surgeries) from patient-level factors, and estimating each institution's observed/expected (O/E) ratio for LS use. Institutions with O/E>2 were defined as LS-dominant. Using hierarchical logistic regression models, we assessed the association between LS preference and in-hospital outcomes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 1,377,118 patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures in 2,336 participating hospitals, use of LS increased in all 8 procedures (35.1% to 44.7% for distal gastrectomy (DG), and 27.5% to 43.2% for right hemi colectomy (RHC)). Those operated at LS-dominant hospitals were at an increased risk of operative death (OR 1.83 [95%CI, 1.37-2.45] for DG, 1.79 [95%CI, 1.43-2.25] for RHC) compared to standard O/E level hospitals (0.5≤O/E&lt;2.0).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>LS use widely increased during 2011-2013 in Japan. Facilities with higher than expected LS use had higher mortality compared to other hospitals, suggesting a need for careful patient selection and dissemination of the procedure.</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e0193186</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5837082</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Association between institutional procedural preference and in-hospital outcomes in laparoscopic surgeries; Insights from a retrospective cohort analysis of a nationwide surgical database in Japan.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5837082</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Watanabe T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yamamoto H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kokudo N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kohsaka S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miyata H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gotoh M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumamaru H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Konno H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mori M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ono M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wakabayashi G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iwanaka T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsubara H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hashimoto H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Association between institutional procedural preference and in-hospital outcomes in laparoscopic surgeries; Insights from a retrospective cohort analysis of a nationwide surgical database in Japan.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To assess the use of laparoscopic surgeries (LS) and the association between its performance and hospitals' preference for LS over open surgeries.&lt;h4>Summary background data&lt;/h4>LS is increasingly used in many abdominal surgeries, albeit both with and without solid guideline recommendations. To date, the hospitals' preference (LS vs. open surgeries) and its association with in-hospital outcomes has not been evaluated.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We enrolled patients undergoing 8 types of gastrointestinal surgeries in 2011-2013 in the Japanese National Clinical Database. We assessed the use of LS and the occurrences of surgery-related morbidity and mortality during the study period. Further, for 4 typical LS procedures, we assessed the hospitals' preference for LS by modeling the propensity to perform LS (over open surgeries) from patient-level factors, and estimating each institution's observed/expected (O/E) ratio for LS use. Institutions with O/E>2 were defined as LS-dominant. Using hierarchical logistic regression models, we assessed the association between LS preference and in-hospital outcomes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 1,377,118 patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures in 2,336 participating hospitals, use of LS increased in all 8 procedures (35.1% to 44.7% for distal gastrectomy (DG), and 27.5% to 43.2% for right hemi colectomy (RHC)). Those operated at LS-dominant hospitals were at an increased risk of operative death (OR 1.83 [95%CI, 1.37-2.45] for DG, 1.79 [95%CI, 1.43-2.25] for RHC) compared to standard O/E level hospitals (0.5≤O/E&lt;2.0).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>LS use widely increased during 2011-2013 in Japan. Facilities with higher than expected LS use had higher mortality compared to other hospitals, suggesting a need for careful patient selection and dissemination of the procedure.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018</publication><modification>2024-11-08T21:47:15.927Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:22:38Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5837082</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29505561</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0193186</doi></cross_references></HashMap>